Arkansas question

Joined
Jun 4, 2010
Messages
6,642
I've recently been putting some fine edge knives into my daily rotation to see how they hold up ( I generally prefer a fairly coarse edge for longevity/utility) and to this end my hard Arkansas (semi translucent) has been seeing a fair bit of use. I've taken to lapping it occasionally if it starts to appear dingy or feels like it might be getting a little clogged - I only use water with a little dish soap for lubricant when sharpening. I usually employ a Smith's fine diamond stone for this job and it always seems to make a difference that can be felt on the stone and in how easily it will impart a decent edge. It will leave most steels very sharp, not quite hair whittling, but just shy - can dry shave (albeit uncomfortably) the stubble off my face, and with a little work on a barber's hone will be capable of whittling.

I recently lapped it with a DMT extra fine stone instead of the usual fine stone and lo and behold it changed some the Arkansas' characteristics. First off it was a lot quieter and has less drag (you can see where I'm going with this) It also imparted a much higher polish to the edge, and even with some extra pressure failed to raise a visible burr. The edge itself is much more refined, almost as bright as what comes off my Belgian coticule - and with casual testing seems to be about as sharp.

Does anyone know if an Arkansas can be lapped to an even higher level, say with the use of rottenstone or diamond lapping compound, and produce edges commensurate with the lapping media? I've never heard of this before, but at least some modest proof of this is sitting right next to me. Technically I believe these stones are rated by density, the surface polish of each stone is something that I never thought too much about before.
 
Yes, they are rated by density . I've lapped my hard Arkansas only with a fine diamond and it gives a nice edge I don't care to go any finer . It will give a good shave . I can see your resulting edge could be influenced by the surface of the stone . Your sharpening technique has a play in the equation as well . DM
 
DM, I couldn't resist a little experimentation, so using my usual "downside" of the stone (both sides are lapped flat and generally there's no noticeable difference between the two) I whipped up a slurry with a Belgian coticule and lapped it using a Franz Swaty hone (both are antiques picked up at household sales). Straight from the stone with an Aus 6 blade it was whittling hair. I'll probably leave the other side alone for now, but it is a good feeling to get more out of my existing gear without spending any more cash. I learned something in the process that I cannot recall hearing from any other source. This could explain in part some of the very different experiences some folks report concerning the use of Arkansas and some other natural stones.

HH
 
I have experienced the same thing with a medium India stone. I flattened the sides with 90 grit SiC paper and went up to 800grit on the face side.

I use the sides for heavy work. Brings up a burr with a few strokes. The smooth face will remove any trace of a burr and leave carbon steel blades with a hair splitting edge.

The only downside is it works much slower.
 
Yes, I've done the same on both Arkansas and India stones and your correct they then cut slower . A characteristic I didn't want . But unless you try things you often don't learn as well . DM
 
Back
Top