Assisted openers, SOG vs. Kershaw...

Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Messages
51
Why should I buy a new Flash or Twitch instead of a Kershaw Chive?

How are the opening mechanisms different?


Are all SOGs made in the USA?


Thanks!!!

Christopher
 
Each knife you listed has their own qualities. First off, I prefer the SOG flash 2 because the size is perfect for my hand. It is large enough to perform just about any job you want it to perform and the blade is super sharp out of the box. Steel is Aus-8, which in my opinion is very good steel, seems to hold an edge well, and when sharpening is needed, usually a ceramic rod brings mine back to razor edge.
The Flash 2 opens with a slight outward pressure on the thumb stud, making it very easy and fast to open, handles are very strong, made of glass reinforced zytel. It also comes with a safety lock, to use so the knife will not open while in your pocket. This knife is very differant than the chive and the twitch 2, because of the way the chive and twitch 2 opens, both open by a flipper bar located on the back of the knives, both I think work basically the same, but again, the twitch 2 is my favorite because of the way it looks and the overall layout of the blade. I like the chive, but I don't like the blade shape as well as I do the twitch 2. It just seems to me there is a lot of blade missing on the chive, whereas, the twitch 2 seems to have more blade than the chive, but you are hearing from a hardcore SOG fan. I think kershaw makes great knives, but I prefer SOG, and I have spent many hours looking and comparing both. I just think SOG is a better knife.
No, not all SOG knives are made in U.S.A., Some are made in Seki Japan, where a lot of fine blades are made these days. Of course not everyone will agree with me, and that is whats so good about this forum, read, look, feel, and decide which one you like the best. :D
Robbie Roberson
P.S. I own all of the assisted openers from SOG, and all perform flawless, and I have never had any problems, I use basic fine machine oil on all my knives and they are super fast and seem to get faster.
 
I own both SOG and Kershaw knives and have found them both to excellent. I very much like the Flash II, both the opening, blade shape, grind and construction. The same can be said for my Kershaw Whirlwind which is may standard work knife. The two couldn't be more different, but I like both. Same comparison applies to chive and twitch. I happen to be carrying a chive in my suit pocket for now. I like the liner lock.

You have to check them both out and choose the one that feel better in your hand.
 
Originally posted by scottsman
I own both SOG and Kershaw knives and have found them both to excellent.
You have to check them both out and choose the one that feel better in your hand.
Right on both counts!:cool:
My opinion is biased and predictable ;) so I recommend handling both.:D
 
I'll be releasing reviews of the Flash II, Scallion, Blackout, and Vapor, among others, this month in The Martialist. The biggest difference between the Flash II and the Blackout (which is the most directly comparable) is the speed of opening. The blade of the Kershaw is lighter and opens much more quickly. (The Flash II still opens fast -- it's a matter of relative speed only.)

I concur with the earlier comments about the dimensions of the Flash II -- it is the perfect size for a "tactical folder" and is well designed.
 
I own a Scallion & a Blink and both work great.

The scallion uses a torsion bar for its spring pressure.

The Blink uses a coil spring for its spring pressure.

Kershaws Scallion can be disassembled for cleaning, spring replacement, and so on.

SOGs recommends the Blink not be serviced by you, but be sent back to the Mfg. for diassembly.

Therefore, if you want to replace a spring or you just want to clean the pivot than Kershaw is the one you want.
I don't know if the twitch is more user friendly than the Blink or the same. I've carried both a lot but seem to always prefere the
Scallion.
 
Back
Top