Hi guys, I'm choosing between Atoma 140 and 400. I have sharpened 50+ knife and I own a king KDS 1000 and Arashiyama 6000. I will be sharpening many really really dull crappy knifes (52-55 HRC) of my friends (so basically need to reshape and put on new bevels). I want to have a coarse stone to complete my set up, and also use it as flattening stone, so atoma seems ideal for me.
I have never tried diamond plates and based on many stories (lol), my thoughts are:
140 is fast cutting, but too coarse for flattening 6000 grit stones, leaving a rough surface. Also it might be eating away too much metal for not-so-dull knifes, and wasting a lot of whetstone when flattening.
400 is faster wearing than 140 (shorter lifespan). Also it might be too slow for reshaping knifes.
Also, how long do they last anyway? I'm a bit worried that those crappy knifes will eat away my expensive diamond plate
I have never tried diamond plates and based on many stories (lol), my thoughts are:
140 is fast cutting, but too coarse for flattening 6000 grit stones, leaving a rough surface. Also it might be eating away too much metal for not-so-dull knifes, and wasting a lot of whetstone when flattening.
400 is faster wearing than 140 (shorter lifespan). Also it might be too slow for reshaping knifes.
Also, how long do they last anyway? I'm a bit worried that those crappy knifes will eat away my expensive diamond plate