In a recent thread somewhere, I thought here on BFC, someone typed something that indicated an attorney's general's opinion was irrelevant or had no effect on law. I wanted to compose a wise response, but did not have time then. Now I cannot find the thread. Well, I just wanted to caution that there is a HUGE difference between a personal opinion and a legal opinion. When an attorney general, district attorney, or appeals court judge issues a legal opinion, it does indeed carry the weight of law, at least until such time as a higher authority or court finds otherwise. Sometimes when a new AG or DA takes office, he will issue an opinion that differs from that of the previous AG or DA, especially if the new one is of a differing political slant. These legal opinions are particularly important in jurisdictions where a particular term, such as dirk or dagger, is not explicitly defined in the legal code.