AUS-6 and 8

Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
6,583
Given equal heat treating and manufacture, what are the pro's and cons of these steels back to back?
 
I think AUS-8 is a seriously under rated blade steel. Re-sharpens without much effort - doesn't chip easily and is cheap enough to manufacture and more importantly finish/factory sharpen that is can be used in knives affordable enough that you don't mind using them.
 
Thanks for the opinions. I do like AUS 8. I really have not had many knives with the 6, or at least I didn't know it if I did. Are there any common knives that use AUS 6?
 
Thanks for the opinions. I do like AUS 8. I really have not had many knives with the 6, or at least I didn't know it if I did. Are there any common knives that use AUS 6?

older sog seal teams were in 6, then the newer ones are in 8.
 
Spyderco and CRKT come to mind with Aus-6.


I too think Aus-8 is underrated , at least on BF it is. IMO a fine steel , especially for those unaccustomed to sharpening knives.

I get a little pleasure out of folks new to the knife world who want the latest in 'supersteels' only to find what a PITA they are to re-sharpen with limited knowledge on how to sharpen a blade. :D

Tostig
 
I can't say I've ever tried AUS 6, though I have tried AUS 8 and like it very much.

I did side by side Manila rope cutting tests with several blades, each of which had a Rockwell hardness of 59. AUS 8 fell between Buck 420HC and 440C in edge retention.

Some of the Kershaw folders are AUS 6. (models that are made in Japan like the Wild Turkey model.
http://www.knivesplus.com/kershawknifeke-4150tf.html )
 
AUS8 will take a wicked sharp edge and is easy to sharpen.


But,like 420HC and the 440 series, it doesn't hold it very well. A more abrasion resistant steel like S30V will outlast the edge on AUv steels by 5 or more to1.

If ease of sharpening is important to you, the AUS series will please you. If edge retention is your goal, avoid it.
 
Back
Top