Aw, great. Another kind of rampage today...

Status
Not open for further replies.
It was a small kitchen knife - impossible to ban it because people would have to stop eating if they did. So maybe the'll ban some other kind of knife to compensate. When there's a high-profile crime, some object has to be punished, to allow society to feel good about itself again!

Maybe we need a "Preaching to the Choir" forum around here.
rolleyes.gif



------------------
- JKM
www.chaicutlery.com
AKTI Member # SA00001
 
Oh I don't know James, they might ban solid food next...
smile.gif


Imagine, only government appointed "Managers Of Meat" would be allowed to cut our food with their Government Issue Steak Knives. These "MOM's", as they would become known, would wield the nutritional power not experienced by human beings since..... wait a minute, MOM? Wow, things really do come full circle
smile.gif
.

What's next? Probably some kid will go on a Biting rampage and they will outlaw teeth. Then they will have to appoint Government Chewers.......sorry about that, I'll stop here...
smile.gif


Brandon

------------------
"You should never never doubt what nobody is sure about..."

[This message has been edited by Elvislives (edited 04-20-2000).]
 
Just proves that where guns can't be had, lo and behold, evil will find another method.
Click to expand...
Another method which is much less effective. There were no deaths in this rampage. Compare it to American counterparts where guns are used.
 
they can impose a .0001 inch blade limit, I will still be able to CUT THE CHEESE nicely.

smile.gif
 
Originally posted by cerulean:
Another method which is much less effective. There were no deaths in this rampage. Compare it to American counterparts where guns are used.
Click to expand...

Can you measure this "much less effective"?
In this case there were no deaths. Obviously a knive is less effective killing weapon but believing that some evil nature will not make up for it is naive. Just give it time.

Kris
 
Let's cut the crap about the knife being a less deadly weapon.

"There are no dangerous weapons, only dangerous people." This was quoted in another post, and it seems quite appropriate. I can understand why a native of Colorado would be upset aobut gun violence, but I go to school with a kid that shot his own brother in the head during an argument. Right, he still goes here.

What you people who are actually against the @nd Amendment are afraid of is that some psycho is going to open fire on some public place while you or a loved one is there. If that happens, do you a person with a CCW and a 10mm sitting next to you, or the president of Handgun Control, Inc?

Be realistic. Banning guns reduces crime about as much as banning kleenex reduces sickness.
 
LOL! What a lesson in denial. Getting shot in the head doesn't hurt you? Thanks for clearing that up, dude. I always suspected that guns might be dangerous, but now I know better.

Talk about denial; it doesn't get any better than saying "There are no dangerous weapons, only dangerous people." Umm... what? An atomic bomb is not a dangerous weapon? What is it then?

There are several good arguments against gun control. Simply denying that guns pose any danger is the worst possible argument I could think of. How ridiculous.
 
And since we have now moved beyond a nasty knife incident to a general discussion of the merits or otherwise of gun/weapons control laws, we move this thread to Politics.


------------------
- JKM
www.chaicutlery.com
AKTI Member # SA00001
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top