axe head shape

Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
93
What are different axe head shapes good for?

The Cold Steel Norse Hawk has a toe beard. The Frontier Hawk doesn't.
VpxbrCQ.jpeg
 
Good question. I've been curious myself such as jersey, wedge, Michigan, Dayton conny etc etc. Thanx for posting hopefully someone with knowledge will post up with more info then we can Google up.
 
There are specialized patterns, but generally the different felling patterns are just a culmination of what the lumberman thought ideal for the woods they're dealing with in that area/ region.

Between those 2 hawks I'd expect the top to stay tight better, because a lot of the force will be applied directly inline with the eye.
The bottom has a more closed bit and the force will be more of an upward angle that I believe would promote the head to loosen sooner.
 
What are different axe head shapes good for?

To begin answering this question a good place to start would be:Where have these shapes come From,originally?

Where did CS find these shapes to peddle,what was the reason such shapes were produced by those that Surely had a practical reason to go through all that trouble of forging and hafting it,and offering it for sale to some population that must've had some use for it?

In that photo above,the top one has the shape that I,personally,can only track back in history to something like a Boarding axe.
A shipboard tool built to slice through rigging in an emergency,to clear wreckage and other general demolition chores,(not an accident that these are related to the later fireman axes).
That is why the blade is so wide,and fan-shaped,it's a rope-cutting tool primarily. That's why it's poll-less,it doesn't take much mass to slice in principle,but a thin wide blade.
So not an "axe" in any conventional wood-working sense.

The second one stems directly from Iberian peninsula and the Bay of Biscay,therefore known as Biscay pattern.
It's a tool made for the maintenance of orchards and vineyards,a light hatchet for smaller branches and brush and an occasional smallish tree.
This one is also unencumbered by any added mass at poll,the nature of it's duty also being on the lighter side.

Similarly with other patterns,the first step is to try to trace them to their country of origin and the time period,to hopefully find out what were they originally meant for.
Later,some tools may've became trade items,and were taken to other places where possibly their use was altered,based on the local needs and requirements.
eventually for some tools the origins may've become obscured,or lost all together.
But that's rare,as any useful shape in history has given an incentive to copy it,or to re-invent it in other location,so Some info is most often available.
 
I wouldn't call either particularly historically-driven design so much as being themed after what the designers thought of as being history-evoking. They are not traditional, but modern "pseudo-traditional" designs made in part as part of "selling a fantasy". That does not mean they are bad tools, but rather means that you need to bear that design philosophy in mind when examining it.

There is a LOT of aspects that influence axe head shape, and I unfortunately do not have time to explore all of those aspects in what I consider sufficient depth. However, there is usually some degree of balance being struck between manufacturing methods, balance, handle requirements, penetration, cut width, and chip bursting/splitting capacity, among other factors.
 
image.jpegThis one may have some similarities matched to the basic profile of the one. Its literal origins/function similar to what's been laid out by Pogrebinsky though more modern than that. The old handle used to model the new, I mean more or less a riven stick still, essentially a replica in every way.
 
"Toe Beard" better for poking & slashing as it is pointier, additionally extending reach. Also, may stick more often when thrown (especially in reverse rotation).

In my experience, there is also a huge difference in blade/edge geometry between these two models as illustrated in my photo comparison below. NorseHawk has significantly fatter geometry.

CS FH vs VH~2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top