Axe ID, maybe Eastern European?

Joined
Dec 25, 2018
Messages
29
The bit is in terrible shape and the handle is just as rough, but I've never been scared of a good project!
Does anyone recognize the mark and style? The woman who sold it to me seemed to have some sort of accent. Maybe Poland.
Help please!
uz8CgeS.jpg
WnykAxu.jpg
tKPeeoQ.jpg
Dhk8j7x.jpg
Ut8UgaN.jpg
tASJ2sn.jpg

It is stamped on both sides...
Thanks!
 
I don't recognize the characters at the top of circle but what looks like "S1715" might be "S17/5". S17 might be a tool steel designation.

It has a D-shaped eye that makes me think German/Eastern European/even Soviet. The problem is that eye shape is now more common in tools made in mass production from many companies.
The inverted triangle mark looks like the more modern, universal "Wear your safety glasses" with MSI underneath.

Where did you find it?

*Circles, triangles
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: A17
Judging from the bit I'd say eye protection might be warranted!
Thanks for your input.

That is all guessing on my part, but if it’s an axe you have now, you might work that steel wedge out and look at it - that might also help you place it. Some of the Soviet axes came with some distinctive ones.
(Or maybe someone used a piece of the bit as a wedge ;))
 
  • Like
Reactions: A17
Agent_H has a good sense about these things,it does appear to be from somewhere East of Germany,which of course puts it square into Soviet block part of the world.
It's one of the countries that uses Latin script vs Cyrillic,so Poland or Czechoslovakia or someone like that.
(Pattern-wise Poland Is a very good guess).
It isnt' an out and out soviet turd-product,it has a poll(most really trashy russian ones are nearly poll-less,wrapped strap more or less);also,the eye in shape and execution is of a good quality,this axe was forged with at least Some care and intent.*
Probably a carpenter's axe,for shipbuilding or the like,and was a fine tool in it's day.
The chip out of the blade looks bad:Take a close look at that break-is the surface all very grainy?Can you see the individual grains/crystals on that surface?
If so,that means that in the manufacturing process the Grain Size issue was neglected,and the steel,when at a proper hardness for the job it's meant for is too brittle,lacking sufficient Toughness(resistance to deformation).

Ideally,were you planning to restore this axe to Original working order,the bit would have to be re-forged,drawn out,and grain structure refined;then of course to be heat-treated anew.
Not an impossible chore,but short of that,if simply ground out,this axe will change to a different type of tool....(not necessarily bad,and if forging services not available,a second-best option).
Cool axe,in any case.

* having written And posted that,now more of the photos filtering through my dreadfully slow connection...I may take that back about the poll,it Does appear to be wrapped afterall,bringing it closer to crap tools influenced by bottomless russian dysfunction...
And inattention to grain-size is very typical of those sad times...
 
Last edited:
This axe came from New Britain Ct., which is coincidentally, birthplace of The Stanley Works. Maybe not so coincidentally N.B. is also famous for a HUGE Polish population.
I'm going to try and save it. Steel didn't look too awfully granular and sparked very nicely. I've done a bit of forging and heat treating so that doesn't scare me but it seems like I might be able to get away with just grinding. Thanks for the input and wish me luck!
Oh yeah, what type of handle would you suggest?
Pix when I'm done...
 
Back
Top