SALTY
Gold Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2000
- Messages
- 5,803
knifejunkie1928 started this thread about picking Becker models that should stay in the line-up: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1445890-Pick-the-becker-line-up
The thread included experience based well thought out replies that characterized posters' thoughts on the various Becker models; a good read.
Then Jeff S1 started this thread regarding models being discontinued versus new models: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...ng-the-line-up-than-new-ones-being-introduced
All of this got me to thinking about shapes and sizes. While I am no expert on knives, I understand that certain designs require a thickness of blade stock or dimension of execution to accomplish their intended purposes; filet knives look the way they do for a reason.
That said, there are certain shapes that span a multiplicity of uses and Ethan's genius seems to find those sweet spots while not denying any of his models their individual character. There are certain Becker knives that have a shape that seems to work in different sizes. My favorites, the BK5 and BK15 have a similar shape and the BK23 looks alot like the BK9/BK10.
That brings me to to the Bundock BK20. Yes, I am familiar with the intended purpose of this knife and understand its dimensions, including blade thickness and resultant weight flow therefrom but who can deny the appeal of the Bundock's shape and style? That brought to my mind the idea of a smaller Bundock, perhaps 2/3rds scale in .19" (or thinner) stock. Seven-inch blades are a useful size and very popular. The Bundock has a style and shape that would sell and in 2/3rds scale would thread the needle nicely between the BK9 and the Tweeners.
If nothing else, a run of the Baby Bundoks would sell to those who bought Bundoks just because, but I sense that in a 2/3rds scale the style might be popular.
The thread included experience based well thought out replies that characterized posters' thoughts on the various Becker models; a good read.
Then Jeff S1 started this thread regarding models being discontinued versus new models: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...ng-the-line-up-than-new-ones-being-introduced
All of this got me to thinking about shapes and sizes. While I am no expert on knives, I understand that certain designs require a thickness of blade stock or dimension of execution to accomplish their intended purposes; filet knives look the way they do for a reason.
That said, there are certain shapes that span a multiplicity of uses and Ethan's genius seems to find those sweet spots while not denying any of his models their individual character. There are certain Becker knives that have a shape that seems to work in different sizes. My favorites, the BK5 and BK15 have a similar shape and the BK23 looks alot like the BK9/BK10.
That brings me to to the Bundock BK20. Yes, I am familiar with the intended purpose of this knife and understand its dimensions, including blade thickness and resultant weight flow therefrom but who can deny the appeal of the Bundock's shape and style? That brought to my mind the idea of a smaller Bundock, perhaps 2/3rds scale in .19" (or thinner) stock. Seven-inch blades are a useful size and very popular. The Bundock has a style and shape that would sell and in 2/3rds scale would thread the needle nicely between the BK9 and the Tweeners.
If nothing else, a run of the Baby Bundoks would sell to those who bought Bundoks just because, but I sense that in a 2/3rds scale the style might be popular.