It's a good lock. I'm not familiar with the knife so not sure which version of the BB lock it uses, but I like the caged BB lock better than trying to grab the slippery ball alone.
That said, I can't agree with the "BB lock is everything the AXIS lock could have been...". IMO the BB lock is trying to emulate the AXIS while making enough changes to get around the patents, but not by making advancements but compromises, though that is completely my opinion.
I don't have a problem with omega springs. Yeah, some may break but it is perpetuated and magnified by the internet. And if one breaks a replacement can easily be made at home with a piece of wire, pliers, and some patience. The AXIS also adjusts for wear, is ambidextrous, and is even more easy to use, IMO, as it's easier to pull back on the lock. It also has less parts and strength comes from slots in the solid liners. The BB lock relies on the back spacer that is held in place by screws. Which can loosen, move, and effect lockup. The lock relies on 4 screws for strength. The AXIS would require the liners to rip apart and the slots tear instead. It's a more simple design and one of the most elegant lock designs on the market. IMO as a (now disabled/retired) mechanical engineer.
I know this is the Spyderco forum and the BB lock is a good lock. I just don't feel it's better than the AXIS and would be happy to debate or hear any thoughts on why the BB is better.
I love Spyderco knives and I like some Bemchmade knives but I love the AXIS lock from an engineering and a user standpoint. There are other good locks but none quite as refined, and I'm excited for the patent to run out so it can be used, tweaked, and refined by other makers in the not so distant future.
Anyways, sorry for going off on a tangent.