- Joined
- Mar 19, 2007
- Messages
- 7,440
Full Tang Kephart:
Steel: A2
Rockwell Hardness: 58 Rc
Handle Material: Black Paper Micarta
Overall Length: 8.805
Blade Length from tip to Ricosso: 4.097 Inches.
Handle Length from butt to Ricosso: 4.728
Ricosso Length: 0.186
Steel Width at Spine of Ricosso: 0.144
Steel Width at blade in front of Ricosso: 0.124
Blade Height at Ricossa: 0.988
Handle Height at Butt: 1.044
Handle Height at Center Pin: 1.005
Handle Height at Front Pin: 0.901
Handle Height at Finger Guard 1.227
Handle Size at Butt: 0.834
Handle Size at Center Pin: 0.786
Handle Size at Front Pin:0.684
First Impressions:
This was one of the best looking knives I have seen out of the box, even from Bark River. Everything about it was just about perfect. I am anal when it comes to fit and finish with any knife that I buy of this expense. I go over every part of the grind, the handle, the rub, the edge, and the polish with great care before I sharpen or use the blade.
The black paper micarta was a high polish when I got it. The pins and lanyard tube were perfectly contoured and matching. The only cause of trouble was up by the finger guard. The micarta was not ground to match the metal and some fit issues arose because of it.
I used some baking soda on the micarta to get rid of the super high polish (and waxy slick finish from the polishing compound). It took the polish off a little too well - and I ended up buffing the handle a little bit to make it look better (hand rubbed with green compound)
The blade had a great finish on it and the logo's were even, straight, and the darkest I have had come from BRKT. Mine is a first production run - so it says that on one side of the blade. The only issues I took with the blade were that grind gets a little off line closest to the ricossa. This makes for the edge to not be flat.
It is a slight error in the grind - but one that I will likely fix. It is little stuff like this that drives me a little crazy. A few more seconds on the grinder could have fixed the handle and the blade and made them perfect. Overall however, I would say this blade came from the factory in the best shape I have seen. Nothing from BRKT that I nit pick has ever effected performance - that is great - but I would remiss in not mentioning the little things.
Sheath:
It is a Sharpshooter type A sheath. It is great. It is Sharpshooter. Here are some pics.
I would wager that is 'nuff said'.
Using the Kephart:
I have used this knife all week. It is a great blade. It slices much easier than my Aurora (thinner stock and a total convex grind) and was plenty sharp. I took the knife over to my bench and put my edge on it. It was very little work as this edge was neat, even, and finely ground. I used a worn 600 grit piece, then moved to a worn 1000, and finally to a worn 2000. I then stropped the edge on Black, Green, Pink compounds and finished on a plain leather strop. It wiped away hair at that point and I could tell very little that I had done to the blade. The companion was not this way - and I was happy to see that this was a fluke.
There is little this knife cannot do - and I wonder how much I will use the companion after all. The round handle makes multiple hand holds very easy as well as allowing you to choke way up on the blade without any finger swell to get in the way. I did get some hot spots with the handle after heavy use - but I cannot tell why this is. It is right at the meat of my palm where the thumb connects and I am not sure why this would be. It may simply be because I was making many heavy cuts with little assistance on walking sticks I was making. It may be that the Aurora can make these cuts easier and that is what I am used to - and it may be that I am not holding the knife the way it needs to be held - and am holding it like the Aurora. The handles are the greatest difference between these two knives and there are great things about both... I need more time to figure the blade out and how to use it best.
The A2 holds an edge very well and sharpens easily. The smaller stock makes a different sound when being used (than the Aurora) but other than that you can tell little difference. One odd thing about the design is that it gets a little fatter at the tip. The blade is about 1 inch at the ricosso but fattens almost 1/10th of an inch toward the tip. This was in the original Kephart, so it is true to his design - but I am not sure why this is or what advatage it gives.
One thing about the hande is that it does not power cut (grab the blade and simply cut away at something) as comfortably as the Aurora (which is contoured for this position very well) but does nearly every other cut more comfortably than the Aurora (which has contours that can get in the way a little in less used positions).
The knife battons well, not as fast as the Aurora (thinner stock) but very well. It sizzles through wood when slicing. It grabs everything you put in its path and wants to slice it. It makes thinner curls than the Aurora (less steep grind) and has a better square on the spine for a fire steel. The one thing I did notice is that this knife seems to be made to make a bow drill kit. It makes good fat dimples for the hearth and handhold. It push cuts into the hearth for the dust notch with ease and makes great spindles.
The knife is fun and would be nearly an ideal bushcrafting knife.
Final Thoughts: The Kephart and the Aurora are nearly the same knife. There are slight handle difference, a little difference in blade length, and a little difference in thickness of the blade. One of these knives will need to go soon - but I cannot decide which one. It may be arbitrary when the call is made. It seems to me that if you are looking for a bushcraft blade that you want to slice more than batton, a thinner rather than thicker blade, and a more versitle handle - the Kephart is probably one for you.
UPDATE:
I sold the Aurora - and kept the Kephart. Mostly however because of buying a few other BRKT knives that I have purchased. I have come to simply LOVE the Kephart. It is one of the best knives I have owned.
TF

Steel: A2
Rockwell Hardness: 58 Rc
Handle Material: Black Paper Micarta
Overall Length: 8.805
Blade Length from tip to Ricosso: 4.097 Inches.
Handle Length from butt to Ricosso: 4.728
Ricosso Length: 0.186
Steel Width at Spine of Ricosso: 0.144
Steel Width at blade in front of Ricosso: 0.124
Blade Height at Ricossa: 0.988
Handle Height at Butt: 1.044
Handle Height at Center Pin: 1.005
Handle Height at Front Pin: 0.901
Handle Height at Finger Guard 1.227
Handle Size at Butt: 0.834
Handle Size at Center Pin: 0.786
Handle Size at Front Pin:0.684
First Impressions:
This was one of the best looking knives I have seen out of the box, even from Bark River. Everything about it was just about perfect. I am anal when it comes to fit and finish with any knife that I buy of this expense. I go over every part of the grind, the handle, the rub, the edge, and the polish with great care before I sharpen or use the blade.
The black paper micarta was a high polish when I got it. The pins and lanyard tube were perfectly contoured and matching. The only cause of trouble was up by the finger guard. The micarta was not ground to match the metal and some fit issues arose because of it.


I used some baking soda on the micarta to get rid of the super high polish (and waxy slick finish from the polishing compound). It took the polish off a little too well - and I ended up buffing the handle a little bit to make it look better (hand rubbed with green compound)
The blade had a great finish on it and the logo's were even, straight, and the darkest I have had come from BRKT. Mine is a first production run - so it says that on one side of the blade. The only issues I took with the blade were that grind gets a little off line closest to the ricossa. This makes for the edge to not be flat.

It is a slight error in the grind - but one that I will likely fix. It is little stuff like this that drives me a little crazy. A few more seconds on the grinder could have fixed the handle and the blade and made them perfect. Overall however, I would say this blade came from the factory in the best shape I have seen. Nothing from BRKT that I nit pick has ever effected performance - that is great - but I would remiss in not mentioning the little things.
Sheath:
It is a Sharpshooter type A sheath. It is great. It is Sharpshooter. Here are some pics.


I would wager that is 'nuff said'.
Using the Kephart:
I have used this knife all week. It is a great blade. It slices much easier than my Aurora (thinner stock and a total convex grind) and was plenty sharp. I took the knife over to my bench and put my edge on it. It was very little work as this edge was neat, even, and finely ground. I used a worn 600 grit piece, then moved to a worn 1000, and finally to a worn 2000. I then stropped the edge on Black, Green, Pink compounds and finished on a plain leather strop. It wiped away hair at that point and I could tell very little that I had done to the blade. The companion was not this way - and I was happy to see that this was a fluke.

There is little this knife cannot do - and I wonder how much I will use the companion after all. The round handle makes multiple hand holds very easy as well as allowing you to choke way up on the blade without any finger swell to get in the way. I did get some hot spots with the handle after heavy use - but I cannot tell why this is. It is right at the meat of my palm where the thumb connects and I am not sure why this would be. It may simply be because I was making many heavy cuts with little assistance on walking sticks I was making. It may be that the Aurora can make these cuts easier and that is what I am used to - and it may be that I am not holding the knife the way it needs to be held - and am holding it like the Aurora. The handles are the greatest difference between these two knives and there are great things about both... I need more time to figure the blade out and how to use it best.

The A2 holds an edge very well and sharpens easily. The smaller stock makes a different sound when being used (than the Aurora) but other than that you can tell little difference. One odd thing about the design is that it gets a little fatter at the tip. The blade is about 1 inch at the ricosso but fattens almost 1/10th of an inch toward the tip. This was in the original Kephart, so it is true to his design - but I am not sure why this is or what advatage it gives.
One thing about the hande is that it does not power cut (grab the blade and simply cut away at something) as comfortably as the Aurora (which is contoured for this position very well) but does nearly every other cut more comfortably than the Aurora (which has contours that can get in the way a little in less used positions).

The knife battons well, not as fast as the Aurora (thinner stock) but very well. It sizzles through wood when slicing. It grabs everything you put in its path and wants to slice it. It makes thinner curls than the Aurora (less steep grind) and has a better square on the spine for a fire steel. The one thing I did notice is that this knife seems to be made to make a bow drill kit. It makes good fat dimples for the hearth and handhold. It push cuts into the hearth for the dust notch with ease and makes great spindles.
The knife is fun and would be nearly an ideal bushcrafting knife.

Final Thoughts: The Kephart and the Aurora are nearly the same knife. There are slight handle difference, a little difference in blade length, and a little difference in thickness of the blade. One of these knives will need to go soon - but I cannot decide which one. It may be arbitrary when the call is made. It seems to me that if you are looking for a bushcraft blade that you want to slice more than batton, a thinner rather than thicker blade, and a more versitle handle - the Kephart is probably one for you.
UPDATE:
I sold the Aurora - and kept the Kephart. Mostly however because of buying a few other BRKT knives that I have purchased. I have come to simply LOVE the Kephart. It is one of the best knives I have owned.
TF