All,
I asked this over on the Becker sub-forum. I got a few answers, but not that many. Thought I would see if I could get a few more over here.
I am more of a saw user when it comes to cutting up stuff. This raises some interesting "energy expended" questions better left for another thread. Apart from that, another reason I favor a saw is because I don't chop enough to be accurate enough to suit me. For the same reason, I am a fan of batoning. I actually own a froe! But I also baton knives. I understand KA-BAR 1095 is quite tough, but the more expensive the knife, the more I hate to, using Ethan Becker's words, "club it." Things can happen, and some knives are not easily replaced.
So, with too much background already, I just jumped on a Zomstro at closeout price. How good is this thing for batoning? It is 1/4" thick 1095 Cro Van, which is good. But it is a deep, flat-ground blade. This means the blade might be a bit thin at the edge, meaning less robust, and that is not good. The blade might also be nice and "wedgie", but I don't know if that is a good thing. For one thing, it contributes to drag. Another point many don't consider is that froes, which are designed to be batoned (clubbed), tend to be thick, not deep, and dull ("dull as a froe" being an old saying.) Some believe that if the froe blade is shaped correctly, the wood is actually splitting "ahead" of the edge, meaning the edge is important only to start the process, and doesn't have much contact once the blade is fully in the wood. The shape of the Zomstro blade does not promote such a splitting action.
Anyway, short version: How well does the Zomstro baton?
Thanks all,
Gun Doc
I asked this over on the Becker sub-forum. I got a few answers, but not that many. Thought I would see if I could get a few more over here.
I am more of a saw user when it comes to cutting up stuff. This raises some interesting "energy expended" questions better left for another thread. Apart from that, another reason I favor a saw is because I don't chop enough to be accurate enough to suit me. For the same reason, I am a fan of batoning. I actually own a froe! But I also baton knives. I understand KA-BAR 1095 is quite tough, but the more expensive the knife, the more I hate to, using Ethan Becker's words, "club it." Things can happen, and some knives are not easily replaced.
So, with too much background already, I just jumped on a Zomstro at closeout price. How good is this thing for batoning? It is 1/4" thick 1095 Cro Van, which is good. But it is a deep, flat-ground blade. This means the blade might be a bit thin at the edge, meaning less robust, and that is not good. The blade might also be nice and "wedgie", but I don't know if that is a good thing. For one thing, it contributes to drag. Another point many don't consider is that froes, which are designed to be batoned (clubbed), tend to be thick, not deep, and dull ("dull as a froe" being an old saying.) Some believe that if the froe blade is shaped correctly, the wood is actually splitting "ahead" of the edge, meaning the edge is important only to start the process, and doesn't have much contact once the blade is fully in the wood. The shape of the Zomstro blade does not promote such a splitting action.
Anyway, short version: How well does the Zomstro baton?
Thanks all,
Gun Doc