So, I thought I would expand on my thoughts about the Becker
Daily.
The handle on the Becker
Daily should shrink in length and height, compared to the current Becker handle. The forward and rear returns (guards) can be shrunk and still be functional, since the
Daily won't be used for chopping or stabbing. You might also consider shrinking the lanyard hole to just slightly bigger than will accept paracord. That in combination with an exposed butt, ala Busse, would help reduce the length of the handle to create better balance, though a long handle could be very good in offering control. One detail that should remain the same, is the swells as opposed to a index finger indentation.
As to the blade on the
Daily, I favor a blade with a sharp point such as the Allen Blade piece submitted above. A drop point is without a doubt, I think, the shape for the
Daily blade, and I like them with points just slightly above the center line. To get the most blade in a local jurisdiction friendly package, I think a choil/extended ricasso should be avoided, but a sculpted front return could provide a choke-up position. In regards to the width of the blade, while I usually prefer a wide blade, such as has been mentioned with the Cold Steel Master Hunter, I think that a mid to narrow blade would best complement the other Becker offerings.
Thinking of the sheath for the
Daily, the now standard Blade-Tech offering would be good, though a fold-over sheath would have less bulk thus better daily carry characteristics. And there is a smaller Tek-Lok available now, isn't there?
BTW, I think
Daily is a really great name, not taken by any other popular knife designs, and it suggests the
Dailys purpose. I considered 'City', but that name would limit it's market, negative suggestion so to speak. 'Personal' rings of something cute or sentimental, and Becker really stands for work, after all, the motto is "Knives that Work" and
Daily suggest that.
Oh, I just noticed, that second column, second knife on the Vought image would work with very little alteration.
1/8th has been mentioned as a steel stock size, but I think that would be too thin, while the knife nuts would love a thinner knife, the general public might not be too pleased, I think 5/32nds would be a perfect compromise.
I am going to post a link to this thread in the General, Reviews, What's New, and Wilderness Forums, see what sort of interest we can generate....
And I thought that I would link to the other thread about the
Daily for the sake of reference.
http://www.bladeforums.com/ubb/Forum21/HTML/000405.html
------------------
Thank you,
Marion David Poff aka Eye, Cd'A ID, USA
mdpoff@hotmail.com
>>--->Bill Siegle Custom Knives<---<<
-http://www.geocities.com/siegleknives-
Talonite Resource Page, nearly exhaustive!!
Fire Page, metal match sources and index of information.
"We will either find a way, or make one." Hannibal, 210 B.C.
[This message has been edited by Marion David Poff (edited 10-28-2000).]