- Joined
- Aug 9, 2006
- Messages
- 718
I'm looking for opinions about what is happening here.
Let me begin. I have owned a BK5 since they were reintroduced into the Becker lineup. It's a great knife and I use it a lot in the kitchen where it performs admirably. The only thing I would change about it is to get rid of the swedge - it is sometimes a nuisance when you need to apply some pressure to the spine in food preparation. It is essentially unmodified apart from a good sharpening and the replacement of the standard grips with the much nicer micarta option.
The tweeners were a long time coming - I had the opportunity to handle the prototypes at the 2011 Bladeshow and was impressed. When they finally hit the market I bought the BK5's little brother, the BK15 (and a BK17 that I haven't done much with yet).
I shall now change direction for a moment. Yesterday I prepared a favourite dish - Spicy sweet potato, quinoa and speck soup. (recipe available if anyone wants it)
Now sweet potato (some of you might call it kumara) is a big tough vegetable - dry, hard and near three inches in diameter. I decided to put the BK15 to the test. Well I'm sad to say it was hard work; so hard in fact I brought the BK5 into action. That big knife was a champion and reduced the sweet potato to small chunks in no time. The 15 on the other hand did not want to slice.
Why the big difference do you think? I must assume the steel and heat treat are identical. Both knives were sharpened by yours truly in much the same way on the same equipment. There are two obvious things that I can think of. The first is the extra power afforded by the big grip on the BK5. The second is the blade coating. The 5 is smooth and slippery while the newer 15 has quite a coarse finish. I know that I could strip both knives to remove the variable, but I prefer to keep the coating for protection, or at least until it becomes very worn.
Anyone have any other ideas?
Let me begin. I have owned a BK5 since they were reintroduced into the Becker lineup. It's a great knife and I use it a lot in the kitchen where it performs admirably. The only thing I would change about it is to get rid of the swedge - it is sometimes a nuisance when you need to apply some pressure to the spine in food preparation. It is essentially unmodified apart from a good sharpening and the replacement of the standard grips with the much nicer micarta option.
The tweeners were a long time coming - I had the opportunity to handle the prototypes at the 2011 Bladeshow and was impressed. When they finally hit the market I bought the BK5's little brother, the BK15 (and a BK17 that I haven't done much with yet).
I shall now change direction for a moment. Yesterday I prepared a favourite dish - Spicy sweet potato, quinoa and speck soup. (recipe available if anyone wants it)
Now sweet potato (some of you might call it kumara) is a big tough vegetable - dry, hard and near three inches in diameter. I decided to put the BK15 to the test. Well I'm sad to say it was hard work; so hard in fact I brought the BK5 into action. That big knife was a champion and reduced the sweet potato to small chunks in no time. The 15 on the other hand did not want to slice.
Why the big difference do you think? I must assume the steel and heat treat are identical. Both knives were sharpened by yours truly in much the same way on the same equipment. There are two obvious things that I can think of. The first is the extra power afforded by the big grip on the BK5. The second is the blade coating. The 5 is smooth and slippery while the newer 15 has quite a coarse finish. I know that I could strip both knives to remove the variable, but I prefer to keep the coating for protection, or at least until it becomes very worn.
Anyone have any other ideas?
