Benchmade 220 vs BM Nimravius Cub - which one would you get?

Functionally they appear very similar. Been thinking about a Cub, but I'll probably buy that 220, just because I LOVE the way it looks (I hadn't seen it before your post).

Here's what gets me. They've got the little bitty Activator in S30V, and the Snody "tacticals" in 154CM. Not to mention the 520, among others.
Who decides this stuff? :rolleyes:
 
Hard to choose.
I think I would take the Nimravus. I seems to me that the handle is a bit more comfortable. But for the rest they don't differ very much.

Shiden


Audentis Fortuna Iuvat
 
The 220. It appears to be more "pointy" on the tip, has a satin finish, has a thicker blade. I'll be getting mine soon. :)
 
I would go for Nimravus Cub.

- a bit longer blade and handle

- handle has skullcrusher end

- blade is slightly thinner( better slicer)
 
Get the 'Cub. I have a pair of the satin models (one is an engraved 50th birthday gift from some of the guys at "The Benchmade Forums" :)), and these little 'Cubs are excellent, solid knives...Not to take ANYTHING away from the BM "220" (you did mean the BM 210, didn't you?), because it is also a nice little knife, but the 'Cub just feels "right".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top