Benchmade Crooked River (Wood) Warning! Contains comparisons to other knives

Joined
Jul 8, 2015
Messages
421
There are a couple of threads featuring the Benchmade Crooked River 15080-1 (with G10 scales) but I was unable to find any featuring the 15080-2 (with Wood scales). So here are my first impressions as a new(ish) collector and a new Benchmade customer.

I respectfully caution anyone who is sensitive to comparisons being made of different styles or grades of knifes, manufactured by different companies. I am an amateur ("noob" if you must) knife enthusiast and I enjoy freely sharing my thoughts and opinions on the knives I've collected and the companies that manufacture them. I welcome opposing viewpoints and guidance from those with more experience and knowledge with this hobby. This post WILL contain many comparisons between this Benchmade model and many ZT and a few Kershaws based on my own subjective opinions, and hopefully many other's opinions in the continuing thread for as long as it remains interesting or until it's sabotaged by whomever.

Enough BS, here's some BM

25640094583_0b08372ca0_k.jpg


First impressions. Unboxing this Benchmade was more enjoyable than any of my ZT's. I get that premium packaging costs more, but at the price range of ZT's knives, I feel a "little" bit nicer packaging is warranted. The Crooked River came in a three piece box (top, bottom and foam bed) inside a microfiber bag with Benchmade printed on it. I preferred it to tearing delicate cardboard tabs and unsticking the flap on ZT's bubble wrap. So that about sums up the first two minutes of ownership between the ZT and Benchmade products I own.

25969992750_7c7ac58fd1_k.jpg


The Crooked River with wood handles is a BEAUTIFUL object. WOW, I am so impressed. I feel that pictures don't do it justice, but that's subjective. Fit on THIS knife is perfect, that's fact. Seams between materials are accurate and even, nothing feels "off". No adjustment is needed, on my knife, out of the box. I was concerned I would not like the orange accents combined with the wood scales. That worry was undue. It works, like a teak deck on yacht with a modern paintjob. These scales are not varnished like on a Buck 110. You could almost imagine getting a splinter, if they weren't so well sanded.

Under a magnifying glass, it's not all roses though. I prefer the blade finish on even my cheapest Kershaw over this. It is not quite tirade inducing, but it's definitely not on par with Kershaw/ZT in my opinion. It's almost like they chose not to skillfully do either a ground finish or a stonewash so they halfheartedly did both. In the absence of a collection of ZT's to compare to I might not have noticed or cared. It's just a nitpick at best for an overall beautiful product.

The aluminum bolsters seem to have a finish like the texture of newspaper. It's almost like there are cellulose fibers pressed into the aluminum itself. It's hard to describe, but perhaps so subjective it wasn't worth mentioning. I presume it is an attempt to hide inevitable scratches by preemptively scratching it for you. I really do feel that pointing these observations out as flaws is blatant and indefensible nitpicking.

It arrived a little stiff and gritty feeling in action, but a little gun oil and some play time and it feels as good as my best and smoothest ZT's with KVT, which just so happens to be a tie between my two large Sinkevich's, my ZT0452CF and my ZT0454-205P. I am surprised how quickly it feels "broken in".

The design is visually striking but in hand, it feels less ergonomic than any single Kershaw or ZT that I own. Every Kershaw/ZT I own feels like I squeezed a wad of clay and they fashioned it into a viable handle for that knife. I spent some time trying to understand why the Crooked River felt so generic in-hand. I believe it comes to down to how every Kershaw/ZT I own treats the users index finger as the primary interface between the users hand and the knife. On the Crooked River, my index finger might as well be my forearm. It doesn't seem to care where it fits in my hand. This may be a factor of its intended use rather than any flaw in design.

Oh. Last thing. This is extremely unreliable so, I don't even believe what I am about to say. I think the only Kershaw/ZT that was as out-of-the-box as sharp as this Crooked River, was My Diskin Hunter fixed blade. But I'm gonna call bulls*** on myself because I never had an issue with sharpness of any of my ZTs. I will say this though, it is perceptably sharper than the ZT045CF that accompanied it and my titanium ZT0450 was a scalpel out of the box. This ZT0450CF seems about as sharp as my regular ZT0450 soooooo. yeah...

End "Wall of words". Begin wall of pics

26176578141_fc79e548ad_k.jpg


25640241173_41b5eb1794_k.jpg


26176620811_a9f1daf8de_k.jpg
 
Last edited:
the gap from the tang to the handle in the closed position ruins the look of the knife to me.
 
the gap from the tang to the handle in the closed position ruins the look of the knife to me.

I agree. I didn't want to pick it completely apart, though. I really do like it a lot, but it's not going to please everyone. I think addressing that cosmetically would also have helped ergonomically or vice versa.
 
I bought the crooked River in wood as well. I am glad you like it.... However, for this knife I find it hard to comment on what is not all roses. No disrespect, I mean this... but a knife is a tool not a Swiss watch.

All of the knives posted are beautiful and worthy for their designs, Maybe something about one that is not as nice as the other.... but seems not fair to call something out under magnification. Not a Benchmade fan boy at all as I have not received it yet. Is it a knife or something else?
 
I agree. I didn't want to pick it completely apart, though. I really do like it a lot, but it's not going to please everyone. I think addressing that cosmetically would also have helped ergonomically or vice versa.

What's with the chip on the shoulder and predictions of sabotage? It's a nice knife that many people (including myself) very much like.

I just don't get the pot stirring. Odd. Distracting. Unfortunate.

Just A well done review with good pics would have been perfectly nice. :confused:
 
Last edited:
I bought the crooked River in wood as well. I am glad you like it.... However, for this knife I find it hard to comment on what is not all roses. No disrespect, I mean this... but a knife is a tool not a Swiss watch.

All of the knives posted are beautiful and worthy for their designs, Maybe something about one that is not as nice as the other.... but seems not fair to call something out under magnification. Not a Benchmade fan boy at all as I have not received it yet. Is it a knife or something else?

To be fair, these are $150-$200 knives. Scrutiny is fully appropriate. A knife is a tool, but tools can be judged like anything else. This is, after all, a review right?

Now if OP was picking apart f&f on a Mora, you would have a point.
 
To be fair, these are $150-$200 knives. Scrutiny is fully appropriate. A knife is a tool, but tools can be judged like anything else. This is, after all, a review right?

Now if OP was picking apart f&f on a Mora, you would have a point.

Under magnification? Sorry this seems silly IMO. To call out anything as far as magnification is redicolus... My opinion you are not required to honor. Even if CRK under magnification seems inappropriate once agin IMO

Even more, you will find issues in real 1k customs under magnification. At $180.00 it's a average price of an well made knife intended to be used.

Once again, no biggie to me but don't think any under magnification is warranted. Speaking my thoughts which I believe is encouraged here...
 
Last edited:
What's with the chip on the shoulder and predictions of sabotage? It's a nice knife that many people (including myself) very much like.

I just don't get the pot stirring. Odd. Distracting. Unfortunate.

Just A well done review with good pics would have been perfectly nice. :confused:
I suppose I was still a bit sore about my other thread getting scuttled by brand loyalties, but I am partially to blame. I should have let it go but I did still have a chip when I posted this thread. The chip is gone, no hard feelings remain. You are right, I likely tarnished this thread a bit with my distracting rant. Hopefully, the rest of my original post redeems it. I appreciate your candid and fair feedback.
 
Under magnification? Sorry this seems silly IMO. To call out anything as far as magnification is redicolus... My opinion you are not required to honor. Even if CRK under magnification seems inappropriate once agin IMO

Even more, you will find issues in real 1k customs under magnification. At $180.00 it's a average price of an well made knife intended to be used.

Once again, no biggie to me but don't think any under magnification is warranted. Speaking my thoughts which I believe is encouraged here...
I used "under magnification" figuratively, to allude to overly critical scrutiny. I attempted to include potential concerns of the most discerning of us. The minute granularity of my observations in the review demonstrate how deeply one would have to look to find flaws and what one might observe at that level of scrutiny rather than outright declaration of any actual flaws. I repeatedly acknowledged that the observations I noted were overly stated.

Ultimately, you're absolutely right in that the level of scrutiny I used to evaluate the Crooked River was exaggerated. But I'm sure someone else reading my review will appreciate the excess of those observations.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top