While I wont ask what you are smoking. I heartally must disagree. I will preface this with the fact that I have been using balisongs for almost 15yrs. I also have both of the balisongs in question and for both EDC or SD I would much rather have a BM. For several reasons.
1) All of my production quality BM and Pacfic Balisongs. The stainless or titanium handled balis lock up tight in both the open and closed positions, This includes balis that have been run HARD for 10 yrs solid of Every Day Carry. Cutting, wire stripping, and light prying. The SWAT while seemingly somewhat solidly built int he handles has not yet stood up to this level of abuse. Addtionally I have my doubts about the thinness of the blade stock used in the swat. I have snapped blades off in targets.
2) ergonomics. the damn swat pinches me every time. I can not make the BMs to do so, Nor can I the taylors, parkers, frosts and FHMS I have.
3) I don't like the blade shape on the swat, if they had dropped the swedge a descent amount lower maybe I would, of Course I never like the utility blade shape on BMs either, always much preferred the weehawk.
4) The latch end on the swat is already beat up. On this supposedly indestructable alloy.
Now having said all this I will say that the swat is a good bali, in fact it is better than some of the older offerings such as any of the zamak handled balisong, no matter how made them. But better than the current or past production balisong line? I am not even going to go near the custom end, nor am I going to compare the swat with the yet unreleased tachyon or monarch, (yet I have both on order

)
I am MAD!!!!!!!!!! Mad I tell you Mad
To each his own
Mike