Big Kudos to Lunde for his photos of Busse Knives

Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
1,532
Ken's has been doing a great job of taking photos of his Busse collection for all of us to enjoy. I've recently started to do the same and I have to admit its ALOT of work. Kudos to Ken for putting in the necessary time and effort! For those who haven't recently visited his updated page please check it out -> http://lundestudio.com/bussecombat.html

His collection has grown tremendously in the last couple of months and the photos just keep getting better!

THANKS KEN!

Greg
 
I didn't realize that he had a compilation of pictures. I've only followed his knife by knife presentations here.

Thanks for the heads up and the link!

Keep up the great work Ken, your photos are amazing:D
 
Thanks Ken, your pics do look great!

Greg, how are your pictures coming along with your new equipment?
 
Thanks Ken, your pics do look great!

Greg, how are your pictures coming along with your new equipment?

Like I said its a lot of work, hours of trial and error, I'm about half way were I want to be. Here are some test shots as I practice...

DSC_0081.jpg

DSC_0083.jpg

DSC_0004.jpg

DSC_0009.jpg

DSC_0013.jpg

DSC_0011.jpg


Let's call them a work in progress.

Greg
 
Good God Man:eek:

I'm going back to drool some more, thanks for the two links, I've never seen them either.
 
I don't know to say, except that I enjoy photographing weapons, because in my eyes they are functional art. In terms of knives, I have found Busse Combat offerings to be very enjoyable to photograph.

And, stay tuned for some Scrap Yard and Swamp Rat knife snapshots.

And Greg, your photos are looking great! The more you experiment, the more satisfied you will become with your photos. I indicate on my web site the date when the photos are taken, because I want to keep track of the vintage of my photos, so that I can progress improvement over time. My earlier knife photos don't look that good, in my opinion, because they lack depth. I have been efforting to improve that.

I'd also like to mention that one of the most frequent questions I am asked is what camera I use. I almost always reply that it is the wrong question to ask, because I have found lighting to be the most important factor, combined with an appropriate exposure. Equipment is important, but technique trumps equipment.

I use a Nikon D200, and have a D300 on pre-order, which I am expecting in a month or so. I have come to prefer the Nikkor 60mm Micro lens for taking these types of photos. It is a genuine macro lens. Some think that "macro" simply means the ability to focus closely. Not true. Macro lenses also ensure correct perspective, meaning that objects with straight lines or edges will appear straight, not slightly curved. And, macro lenses generally offer smaller apertures, for increased depth-of-field.
 
Really excellent photographs, Ken, and a wealth of reference for us newbs who don't get to see many lesser-known Busse blades in person. I thank you!

A girl needs a knife...
 
I'd also like to mention that one of the most frequent questions I am asked is what camera I use. I almost always reply that it is the wrong question to ask, because I have found lighting to be the most important factor, combined with an appropriate exposure. Equipment is important, but technique trumps equipment.

I use a Nikon D200, and have a D300 on pre-order, which I am expecting in a month or so. I have come to prefer the Nikkor 60mm Micro lens for taking these types of photos. It is a genuine macro lens. Some think that "macro" simply means the ability to focus closely. Not true. Macro lenses also ensure correct perspective, meaning that objects with straight lines or edges will appear straight, not slightly curved. And, macro lenses generally offer smaller apertures, for increased depth-of-field.

for me, there are 2 elements of equipment that are important, outside of set up. The sensor quality at a given iso, and the maximum apertures and sharpness of the lens. certain pictures I've seen on here have been taken at 400+iso, and the grain is very visible, where as with a higher end canon or (any other brand), the grain would not have been visible until 800+, especially in a tripod set up.

and it's always interesting to know how far away the person is from the subject :D if your using a 24mm macro your going to be pretty close in there to get a full frame image, and your subject is more likely to suffer from some level of perspective distortion (the back is smaller then the front), where as with a 300mm macro lens - your gonna be across the room :D, but it will suffer from almost no visual distortion from front to back on a tilted object.

as far as pin cushioning or barrel distortion - it's worth noting that photoshop cs2 or higher has fantastic lens distortion correction. you can figure out what the perfect + or - number for your lens is to correct for the distortion, set a keyboard marcro for it and bam, with the press of 2 buttons the distortion from your photo is gone.

I've found that for art photography that is mostly hand held, the camera used is not that important, its the artistic vision and eye of the person using the camera that really determines the quality of the photo.


but with product photography, the other elements of your equipment begin to become more important, like your lighting set up, your lens, and the positioning/ settings you use for a given product.


the hardest thing to over come that I've seen and experienced is captureing the extremes of the dynamic range, essentially leveling out everything so that information is not lost across the board. bussecollector is doing good, but his lighting is to severe, leaving shadowed area's that lack information, or bright area's that are blown out. (but definitely getting there :D:thumbup: )

your photography is pretty much crisp and visible from head to toe. so ya, hats off to you for it! :thumbup:
 
bussecollector is doing good, but his lighting is to severe, leaving shadowed area's that lack information, or bright area's that are blown out. (but definitely getting there :D:thumbup: )

your photography is pretty much crisp and visible from head to toe. so ya, hats off to you for it! :thumbup:

Most definitely, still trying to figure out the lighting. I have two Omnis and a Tota, powerful stuff!

Greg
 

lunde, I wold send you some interesting busse pieces if it wasn't for the fact that you live to close to Woody and hairball.:D

You pics are incredible.

Do you mind if I download your pics to my hard drive?
 
Cobalt, you wrote:That's why they're there. :thumbup::thumbup:

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/correctinglensdistortion.htm

I don't know what software you use, but if its photoshop cs2 or higher, thats a basic tutorial for correcting tilt perspective, and somewhere on there is a tutorial for pincushion/barrel distortion. (obviously tilted subjects that are meant to be tilted don't apply, but the lens distortion one may help a little, depending on your lens :) )

fun stuff :D
 
Back
Top