db said:
I don't know how the Norton Stone is compared to the cheap hardware store hones ...
It is the favorite of many of the high end makers like Goddard, he recommends it in pretty much everything he writes on sharpening, Wilson is the same. Many of them finish on the fine india side, Wilson leaves it with the coarse side for maximum slicing aggression.
They are probably quicker too if you count the setup time for sandpaper mounting on wood and replaceing the paper after it wears out.
Set up time is pretty much instant, you just staple it to a piece of wood. To wear it out requires a *lot* of grinding, you would have a large hollow in any stone by that time and the time it takes to lap a stone is
many times greater. To replace it you just tear it out and staple on another piece.
I have a belt sander and don't use it much anymore for this type of regrinding because doing it by hand even with the cheap hardware store stone was just as fast when you factor in cleanup, setup, and really start to finished ...
Try turning the belt sander on.
Belt sanders turn at 3000+ ft/s, to match the speed you need to make 75 passes per second on a 8" stone of similar grit. In general it is difficult to even do five per second at heavy pressure for any sustained length of time so a sander is easily ten to one, which is why you don't see a lot of knife makers using stones to make knives.
There are some knives I don't use a belt sander on because the edges are too thin. When blades get under 0.010" thick, unless they are HSS, they over heat too rapidly. When they get really thin, under 0.005", and under 10 degrees per side, they tend to burn almost instantly. You really need a water cooled system for those geometries.
-Cliff