Big Mitt Update

Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Messages
305
Big Mitt Update

It’s been a little over a year since I reviewed the Big Mitt, a short-blade model that comes in two blade sizes -- a 3-inch and a 4-inch -- and has an extra-long handle. (October 21, 2016 review. The original pics are gone, but I found others and edited the text to fit them.)

eTP4qtc.jpg


The Big Mitt is a big success for me. With a 3 1/3-inch, 3/32 A2 blade, it has become my main utility knife around the house. Though I often carry a Bushcraft Karda, short-blade Patch, or Surls Big Palmer in my pocket, I usually reach for the Big Mitt first, unless one of the smaller blades would work better. Fact is, I like it so much I’m always looking for something to use it for.

The top curve of the Big Mitt’s blade is the same as the Monarch’s and Bushfinger’s, two of my favorite blade shapes. And the blade height and cutting edge make for an excellent utility profile. The model’s 5 3/4-inch handle extends all the way to the edge of my palm, allowing me to bear down in a full-hand grip.

I’ve modified the handle somewhat to get the most out of my gimpy grip. The pinch grip I use depends mainly on squeezing a handle in two places: in front between my thumb and my index finger knuckle (the outer half of my index finger has zero strength), and in back between the base of my palm and my pinky, the only digit with 100 percent strength and sense of touch.

My guiding principles for the reshaping effort were (1) maximize surface area contact with skin, especially at the front and back squeeze points, but also anywhere else I could; and (2) subordinate looks to grip. As I worked, a third principle emerged: Beware of how optimizing one grip can impair another. Several times I upset the tradeoffs, but since Big Mitt scales come with plenty of material, I was able to restore the balance I wanted. The result is a super-comfortable, asymmetrical handle optimized for my right hand. I’ve left some spots rough to add traction, but may smooth them out later.

QrlNzAA.jpg


I re-contoured the right front of the handle to align with the path my index finger follows around the top and right side of a handle. The curve also distributes the knuckle’s squeezing pressure evenly. The photo below also shows how I flattened the back right side to make the knife more stable when my thumb is on top of the spine.

19ycRvT.jpg


For the thumb pad I made an indentation, which helps keep my hand from sliding forward on the handle.

rKol1Sx.jpg


The Big Mitt lacks a palm swell in the middle section of the handle, so I simulated one by narrowing the left side starting about two-thirds back, creating a slope for the ring finger to press against. I also made an underside hook like a Bushfinger’s which helps both ring and pinky fingers grip better and really locks the pinky in place. (See silhouette photo.) The back left side contours, aft of the simulated palm swell slope, are basically those of my Woodsman and fit the path the ring and little fingers take when gripping the handle tightly. For lighter grips, I made a flat spot on the edge for the pinky to press against, shown below.

p3dpQzb.jpg


I made a swale on the top back of the spine, sort of like the Protagonist, Renegade, and Maverick. This increased the surface area for the heel of the palm when pressing down on the handle. (Visible in silhouette photo.)

Altogether I removed a little more than one-third ounce and shifted the balance point forward about a quarter of an inch. Most important, the Big Mitt now provides the most secure and stable grips of any knife I’ve held.

uJiOkoj.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the update Jim. That is a unique knife in the Fiddleback line-up. It is nice to hear that it is serving you well.

Like many of us, you tried a number of models along the way to learn what works best for you. I appreciate the fact that you were brave enough to modify the handle shape to make it a perfect fit for your hand. Very cool! :thumbsup:

Phil
 
Nice update Jim. I will attempt to give you my thoughts on the 4" version soon and if possible get it to you for review, darned life things keep getting in the way!
 
Thanks, Phil. It was seeing how you modified a couple of your handles, especially photos of a Sneaky Pete in your "Guard"? or "Guardless"? thread last August 4, that gave me the courage to take a file to the Big Mitt. The photo below shows how it looked in late August or early September: Front pinch spots done, bit of a hook on back underside. That's when it really looked good to me.

Gg1Ca0x.jpg


But the more I used it, the more I thought about making a frog-back swale on the top. Fixing the front pinch grip had been a no-brainer. But I didn't want to give up the overall lines of the knife. As it happened, though, it was that swale that really secured the knife in my hand. That in turn required working on the sides to fix grips altered by the swale. Made me think of Andy's comments about "chasing," which I think he made about getting a grind even on both sides of a blade. Even taking out a few bumps in the swale with a new file I just bought Monday screwed it up. Made the knife feel in my like a boat that's lost tight linkage with its rudder. So I had to re-do the micarta a bit on both sides of the spines to reset the knife's correct vertical orientation. Learning how little it takes to change the whole feel of a handle has given me a better appreciation for what Andy and his crew achieve with their great ergonomics.

Jules -- No hurry. I have no doubt the 4-inch blade will excel. It looks very much like my favorite blade profile of all I've tried, the Monarch. I look forward to reading your impressions when you get time to put it to work yourself.

Jim
 
Last edited:
A few comparison pics of 4" Big Mitt - Monarch, Drop Point Maverick, Bush Hermit, Kephart, Big Mitt.
1RZaaOT.jpg

In my mind the Big Mitt was a Kephart on steroids - i think they have similar profiles. I no longer have a Bear paw Bushcrafter to compare but I think the blade profile is close to the Big Mitt.
QtAm8Jb.jpg

Next to Monarch.
DjB1nj3.jpg
 
Last edited:
After handling the Big Mitt for a while I was pleasantly surprised at how many comfortable grips I could acquire.I was able to choke right up on the guard/ricasso where the weight of the handle made the blade very light for fine tasks. Next in a central overhand grip the knife was perfectly balanced for me on the second set of pins for general usage. Lastly due to the length of the handle I could get a full hand grip behind the forward finger groove which enabled a light chopping action. I guess this versatility was not the intended benefit for users with larger hands but it has certainly opened my eyes to the usefulness f the model. If you look closely you'll notice this one is in Osage which means this one's mine :)
 
Very helpful photos and description, Jules. Your 4-inch Big Mitt is definitely a Kephart on steroids. The photo below shows why it's not a Bear Paw on steroids, though; the handles are very different (big palm swell on Bear Paw, creating a long mid-section, followed by a short aft section.)

LEd4H52.jpg


Next photo shows my 3-incher superimposed over your 4-incher. The 3-incher has a Kephart handle on steroids but not the same blade profile, as does the Bear Paw. The 3-inch blade is more of a drop point, like the Bush Hermit's and Drop Point Maverick's. Though its cutting edge is shorter than the 4-incher's, its belly makes it quite effective for its length.

BTd0yyK.jpg



Here's an example of how I used it yesterday. "Honey, would you get "Little Stubby" and cut this squash in half?"

Z6Wv8x2.jpg


You chose good models to compare with the Big Mitt. It makes me very interested in the Bush Hermit as a model to consider trying (tall handle and palm swell, drop point blade profile) and the Drop Point Maverick as a handle shape.

In my update I didn't show my "simulated palm swell" -- a slope at aft end of the mid-section. The mid-section of the handle (photo below) is the only part I didn't change. Before I picked up my file, the mid-section's relatively flat sides and underside extended with only slight variation back toward the butt end, like a Kephart's. So I imagined a Bear Paw palm swell and tried to picture where it would narrow down. Palm swells really help keep my weak hand from sliding forward.

KA6WTzz.jpg


Thanks again, Jules. Very helpful.

Jim
 
Last edited:
Great to see the knife. You are now a budding tool maker. LOL.
 
Thank you, Andy. We are all descended from tool makers. Our hands want to make tools. It's in our genes. So I think it's very commendable how you have built a business in the 21st century that supports several families by doing just that.
 
Back
Top