I will try to state this without insulting anyone or starting any flame wars. :footinmou
I do not consider abusing a knife until it breaks as "testing". If you are curious, have more money than you need, or just feel destructive today, go for it.

You can wear yourself out, for there is NO knife than can't be broken.
But if you really want to test a knife, use it for what it was designed.

Knives are made to cut, slice, stab, and in some cases, chop. It is more important to learn how to use a knife.
In the "test" as it was written, once the knife was stabbed into the material, was it lateral pulling that was applied until the tip broke? If so, this is not the way to remove a knife! Then it was pounded into a tree and weight was applied (again it sounds as if it was lateral) until it broke. WHY?
If you want a pry bar, buy one! But don't break your knife and then be disappointed that you did! Go back and re-read the testing. In every phase of the test where the knife was used as it should be, the Becker did very well.
I have "used" a Becker BK9 since they came out (until my father-in-law stole it). The only reason I have not gotten another is that I want to see the Extreme models first. For the cost of the BK9, I have yet to find a better knife.
Now, for those who have noticed that I have done photographs for Camillus and may think that I am influenced by this, think about it for a minute. I have shot knives for hundreds of custom makers and a few other companies. I have more knives than I really need and most of them much higher priced than the Beckers. But if you find me in the woods, and I'm there just about every week, you'll find a Becker knife with me.