Bk9 What If...

Would you like to see an “upgraded” BK Lineup?


  • Total voters
    15
Joined
Jun 12, 2020
Messages
42
What if Becker Kabar offered their famous Bk9 or even their Bk line in other steels and handles? I know they do at least D2 on the Extreme. Wouldn’t a satin D2 Bk9 with included and attached micarta handles just be amazing? Dream big but S35Vn is pretty available/affordable in the US...not to say there’s anything wrong with ol’ CroVan but c’mon, it would be niiiiiiice!

...Yes to 3V!
 
Last edited:
micarta ? i would like that too
luv orange <hint>
molle sheath could do with a couple of
old fashion eyelets down the sides.
and seeing how a 9 iweighs, would be mighty considerate to throw in a BK (big knife) backpack or at least some dual shoulder strap carry system :-)
 
3v would be a serious upgrade. Though not needed, it would be appreciated and likely sell well in the enthusiast community. D2 or something stainless would not be in line with the BK9 role IMO, and thus not an upgrade. Go 3v or leave it alone.
 
While an upgraded steel, sheath, and standard scales would be awesome I think that it really goes against the design intent of the Becker series.

I feel that the whole idea was to produce a line of affordable, well made knives that can be easily sharpened and will last a lifetime. Every addition we knife enthusiasts make to “upgrade” them moves farther away from that core ideal. Yes, the sheaths suck, but it keeps the overall costs down and they work for the average buyer. I really don’t see them moving away from 1095 in general either. Firstly they are tied to Kabar and that’s the most available steel they use so branching off probably wouldn’t be cost effective (unless it was a sprint run). Second, take a look at the video ESEE put out when they first started producing the S35VN models where they broke an ESEE-4. Not that 1095 is impervious to breaking but it was tried and true in the design and it seemed they only moved to S35VN due to consumer pressure, not because it was something they wanted as a company.

I think the best the enthusiast market could hope for is a limited run, maybe yearly, of 3V steel and micarta handled versions of the BK-2, 7, and 9. Although I think D2 would be more likely since it’s a steel also used by Kabar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
3v would be a serious upgrade. Though not needed, it would be appreciated and likely sell well in the enthusiast community. D2 or something stainless would not be in line with the BK9 role IMO, and thus not an upgrade. Go 3v or leave it alone.

You said exactly what I was going to say. 3V or it's a waste of time. There's really nothing wrong with good ole 1095, as evidenced by how many Beckers have sold over the years in that steel.
 
While an upgraded steel, sheath, and standard scales would be awesome I think that it really goes against the design intent of the Becker series.

I feel that the whole idea was to produce a line of affordable, well made knives that can be easily sharpened and will last a lifetime. Every addition we knife enthusiasts make to “upgrade” them moves farther away from that core ideal. Yes, the sheaths suck, but it keeps the overall costs down and they work for the average buyer. I really don’t see them moving away from 1095 in general either. Firstly they are tied to Kabar and that’s the most available steel they use so branching off probably wouldn’t be cost effective (unless it was a sprint run). Second, take a look at the video ESEE put out when they first started producing the S35VN models where they broke an ESEE-4. Not that 1095 is impervious to breaking but it was tried and true in the design and it seemed they only moved to S35VN due to consumer pressure, not because it was something they wanted as a company.

I think the best the enthusiast market could hope for is a limited run, maybe yearly, of 3V steel and micarta handled versions of the BK-2, 7, and 9. Although I think D2 would be more likely since it’s a steel also used by Kabar.


Esee would have done better using Aebl, it is much tougher than S35vn.
 
I agree with lots of others that 3v would be cool but then the price would go up...and depending on how much it went up people would compare it to other well known respected 3v outdoor knives...and then the topic would become is it worth paying X-amount for a 3v bk9 when you can get X-brand for just slightly more and they have proven history (with that steel)....
 
While an upgraded steel, sheath, and standard scales would be awesome I think that it really goes against the design intent of the Becker series.

I feel that the whole idea was to produce a line of affordable, well made knives that can be easily sharpened and will last a lifetime. Every addition we knife enthusiasts make to “upgrade” them moves farther away from that core ideal. Yes, the sheaths suck, but it keeps the overall costs down and they work for the average buyer. I really don’t see them moving away from 1095 in general either. Firstly they are tied to Kabar and that’s the most available steel they use so branching off probably wouldn’t be cost effective (unless it was a sprint run). Second, take a look at the video ESEE put out when they first started producing the S35VN models where they broke an ESEE-4. Not that 1095 is impervious to breaking but it was tried and true in the design and it seemed they only moved to S35VN due to consumer pressure, not because it was something they wanted as a company.

I think the best the enthusiast market could hope for is a limited run, maybe yearly, of 3V steel and micarta handled versions of the BK-2, 7, and 9. Although I think D2 would be more likely since it’s a steel also used by Kabar.

Certainly, affordability and functionality make some of the best knives. But I say they should keep the current BKs and offer a premium line! That’s one of the beautiful things about knives it’s such a simple tool but can be taken to incredible places through design, ingenious, and technology. Love seeing the limits pushed!
 
Do you know if people liked it?

I don't recall them flying off the shelves- they were pretty expensive (at the time, a Camillus BK-7 was around $55, and the S30V version was over $200 IIRC- the limited KaBar version made from Camillus bankruptcy blanks was even more, but those went quick). The folks who bought them seemed to like them, though.
 
:)
I agree with lots of others that 3v would be cool but then the price would go up...and depending on how much it went up people would compare it to other well known respected 3v outdoor knives...and then the topic would become is it worth paying X-amount for a 3v bk9 when you can get X-brand for just slightly more and they have proven history (with that steel)....

Perhaps they should just offer them in “Carbon V” :)

Edit: less anyone miss the joke, Carbon V was Cold Steel’s proprietary name for 1095 cro-van.

n2s
 
Last edited:
Back
Top