The stone (10 x 3 x 1) is a pleasure to use. Perhaps you have to be a fanatic to understand that, but it's smooth and your strokes seem to improve and flow.
But does it work and is it worth the effort.
Case in POint: On a lark I purchased a Mercer ten inch chef knive for bargain prices.. To my surprise the knive is a beauty. No large steel bolster, no rivets in the handle, and I would assume stamped rather than forged (though the tapping test is solid and sounds like forged). The overall knife is sensational and if I'm been working mostly with Hanckens and Wustof's this cheapie, though different, seemed to be right there.
The knife passed all my paper tests, but the edge seemed coarsely ground and, if not 'ragged" neverthess toothy with the grind mark all up and down the bevel. - even if that "toothiness" wasn't reflected in the silkie way it cut the paper.
I worked the darn thing for an hour on the black Arkansas, got a nice sound even if there was little resistance. Couldn't see any visible difference. Went back to my "hard" Arkansas and worked on that and then finished again on the super smooth black stone.
In both instances I stropped (green). A view under a magnifying glass seemed to confirm that my angle was correct and in line with the original angle used on the blade.
The grind marks were still there, though apparenatly not as deep and I didn't get the mirror shine I was looking for. Under the magnifying glass the edge looks near to perfect. The paper cutting was silkier and I almost cut circles free hand.
The steel is X30Cr13, is that especially hard and therefore resitant to the black stone's coaxing?
Is in fact, the black stone worth the trouble?
This was an exercise for fun on a ridiculously low priced knife and I suspect the toothy edge might be more effective at grabbing and cutting than the mirror edge I was looking for. The knive was so cheap and so impressive that I ordered another one simply to have a basis for compaisrion.
Still a newbie at this, I'd appreciate any insight.
But does it work and is it worth the effort.
Case in POint: On a lark I purchased a Mercer ten inch chef knive for bargain prices.. To my surprise the knive is a beauty. No large steel bolster, no rivets in the handle, and I would assume stamped rather than forged (though the tapping test is solid and sounds like forged). The overall knife is sensational and if I'm been working mostly with Hanckens and Wustof's this cheapie, though different, seemed to be right there.
The knife passed all my paper tests, but the edge seemed coarsely ground and, if not 'ragged" neverthess toothy with the grind mark all up and down the bevel. - even if that "toothiness" wasn't reflected in the silkie way it cut the paper.
I worked the darn thing for an hour on the black Arkansas, got a nice sound even if there was little resistance. Couldn't see any visible difference. Went back to my "hard" Arkansas and worked on that and then finished again on the super smooth black stone.
In both instances I stropped (green). A view under a magnifying glass seemed to confirm that my angle was correct and in line with the original angle used on the blade.
The grind marks were still there, though apparenatly not as deep and I didn't get the mirror shine I was looking for. Under the magnifying glass the edge looks near to perfect. The paper cutting was silkier and I almost cut circles free hand.
The steel is X30Cr13, is that especially hard and therefore resitant to the black stone's coaxing?
Is in fact, the black stone worth the trouble?
This was an exercise for fun on a ridiculously low priced knife and I suspect the toothy edge might be more effective at grabbing and cutting than the mirror edge I was looking for. The knive was so cheap and so impressive that I ordered another one simply to have a basis for compaisrion.
Still a newbie at this, I'd appreciate any insight.