Not every hand made knife is perfect.
Some knifemakers learn and improve. Why denigrate their less than perfect work as long as the knife is fuly functional and represents a best product for the maker?
Not every knife costs more than $500.
Rember, a flaw is "an imperfection, often concealed, that impairs soundness." A new maker can make a perfectly sound knife that may not be exactly centered for any of the reasons given above. Not all of those reasons mean the knife is not fully functional. It could even be good art, although maybe a bit cruder compared to one of the masters.
I have a $240 liner lock from a master smith. He's a fixed blade man getting into folders. The flat thin ground bowie blade is to die for...zero bevel, the real deal. It's got a good heat treat. On one of this master smith's fixed blades, it'd be at least $450. Titanium liners makes a tight package. Elegant yet simple file work on the back spacer rounds out the design. The file pattern is unique. Its handle and ergonomics makes the knife feel as if it is part of your hand.
However, the knife blade is not centered. The blade is off center, but does not touch any liner and the frame is as tight as the proverbial drum. The off-center in no way affects the knifes function. There are a few other minor fit and finish "problems" none of which are "flaws." They're only noticable to a knife nut. If you're not overly critical, they can be seen as "character." I bought it, love it, use it regularly. For $240 it's a bargain and the lock bar, blade position and solidness haven't changed since it was bought. It's not perfect, but it's not "flawed", but then it wasn't bought to be a safe queen or as an investment.