Ok. I see a lot of folks criticizing knives based on blade centering. Mind, this is centering on its own (vel non if you are fancy), not a lack of centering that causes rub. Is this really an issue with slipjoints?
First, my experience began with multiple blade patterns where centering is difficult to evaluate, again short of blade rub.
Centering seems to be an issue that sort of originated with the tactical type knives, with their adjustable pivots and frame and liner locks exerting lateral pressure on the blades. It may be related also to the degree of "interference" between the frame lock and tang that the tactical guys love to obsess over.
I suppose it can still be evaluated on a slipjoint as a measure of quality, but it seems so difficult to achieve with peened pivots that it is almost unfair to evaluate on this basis. This is doubly or triply true on a multiblade.
Am I just finding excuses for slipjoints?
First, my experience began with multiple blade patterns where centering is difficult to evaluate, again short of blade rub.
Centering seems to be an issue that sort of originated with the tactical type knives, with their adjustable pivots and frame and liner locks exerting lateral pressure on the blades. It may be related also to the degree of "interference" between the frame lock and tang that the tactical guys love to obsess over.
I suppose it can still be evaluated on a slipjoint as a measure of quality, but it seems so difficult to achieve with peened pivots that it is almost unfair to evaluate on this basis. This is doubly or triply true on a multiblade.
Am I just finding excuses for slipjoints?