Hey guys, new to the forum but it seems like there are some pretty knowledgeable people here so I figured I'd get some opinions. I'm by no means a serious collector but I do hunt a lot and like to have quality blades. I'm partial to Boker and skin with a lock back knife with a 3 1/8" Cronidur 30 blade. I love this knife (it holds an edge as well as 440c and is ten times as resistant to corrosion), but have found myself wishing I had a little bit longer blade when skinning larger game.
I'm considering buying another Boker lock back with a 3 5/8" blade but I'm concerned because the blade is made of 420 instead of 440c or Cronidur. I know the Rockwell Hardness of 420 is 54 and the Rockwell Hardness of 440c and Cronidur is 58; how noticeable of a difference will this make in the knife's ability to hold an edge while skinning heavy game like elk? Also how does 420 compare to 440c in the corrosion resistance department?
Last thought/question is this: Boker uses very high quality, hard steels in all of their blades. Why would they choose to use 420 in this one knife? Does the extra half inch really require the knife to be that much less brittle?
I'm considering buying another Boker lock back with a 3 5/8" blade but I'm concerned because the blade is made of 420 instead of 440c or Cronidur. I know the Rockwell Hardness of 420 is 54 and the Rockwell Hardness of 440c and Cronidur is 58; how noticeable of a difference will this make in the knife's ability to hold an edge while skinning heavy game like elk? Also how does 420 compare to 440c in the corrosion resistance department?
Last thought/question is this: Boker uses very high quality, hard steels in all of their blades. Why would they choose to use 420 in this one knife? Does the extra half inch really require the knife to be that much less brittle?