I see a lot of criticism - and not just about one brand - about blade play in their knife. Basically it's a complaint of low quality that reflects on the maker.
Um, it's a mass produced folding knife intended to be used in the open position? Even fixed knives have flex in the blade, fillet knives are designed that way.
So, is there any specific quantifiable criteria with actual examples to demonstrate what is bad play and what is functionally acceptable? Not just "My expectations were devasted because I bought a POS - waah!"
More like, "I measured x.xxx inches of play x.x inches from the pivot which caused the liner lock ramp to change angle .xx minutes of a degree, changing the normal lock up pressure of x.x ounces of force to .xx, causing the blade to unlock while cutting using the spine as a dull edge through jello. My fingers were severed."
I'm not really looking for lab analysis (and remember, you can't have analysis without anal) - just tired of the uninformed talk. Can we agree on what the specifics are and why?
Um, it's a mass produced folding knife intended to be used in the open position? Even fixed knives have flex in the blade, fillet knives are designed that way.
So, is there any specific quantifiable criteria with actual examples to demonstrate what is bad play and what is functionally acceptable? Not just "My expectations were devasted because I bought a POS - waah!"
More like, "I measured x.xxx inches of play x.x inches from the pivot which caused the liner lock ramp to change angle .xx minutes of a degree, changing the normal lock up pressure of x.x ounces of force to .xx, causing the blade to unlock while cutting using the spine as a dull edge through jello. My fingers were severed."
I'm not really looking for lab analysis (and remember, you can't have analysis without anal) - just tired of the uninformed talk. Can we agree on what the specifics are and why?