I love Spyderco, but personally, I'd take a BladeTech Magnum Pro-Hunter over a Spyderco Military, that is,
if they were both exactly the same price. I don't feel the Magnum PH offers anything over the Military to justify a higher price. I have a Pro-Hunter (non-Magnum) and two Mils.
The original PH has a .040 thick liner, whereas the Mil's is .050 (the new, Magnum PH's is .050 also). That was one area where I've favored the Mil over the PH. The PHs have always had dual, nested, full liners, whereas, up until recently, the Mil has had only one, nested, full liner (it now has a nested, partial liner on the non-locking side). Score one for the PH. As far as blade steel, the Mil is available in many more choices, but both knives have S30V as their standard steel. The tip of the PH is a lot more robust than that of the Mil, though the Mil cuts like a laser. The PH definitely outshines the Mil in regards to carry options, as it drilled and tapped for 4-way carry.
I'm not a fan of liner-locks, but, in my opinion, the Mil and the PH are the top two when it comes to perfect geometry and solid lockup! IMHO, they set the standard! I don't worry about using either one hard. As far as grip goes, the Mil takes the cake. Though both can be had in Carbon Fiber vs. the standard G-10, Spyderco's "peel-ply" CF is a lot better than BT's CF. Both are made in the USA, both have solid people and warranties behind them, but the Mils are much more available (easier to find) at prices below MSRP.
This is going to be a very close one, so good luck if you're going to be making a choice!
Regards,
3G