PhilipWimberly
Gold Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2023
- Messages
- 78
I'm in the Boone/Blowing Rock/Banner Elk area of NC right now. I haven't spent much time here, but I've never been anywhere that I've seen as many "vintage" axes for sale. (Old tools in general, but wow! The blade tools on hickory are abundant!) For anyone interested, they are from $20 to $60, with a few over $100. Most old handles, if not original. 99% have been de-rusted. Precious few with any markings or embossing. If they are marked (less than 5%), virtually all are Plumb or True Temper...an occasional Collins and I can remember seeing one really trashed Sager Chem 1943 saddle axe.
I wonder if anyone knows why so many are here? The "mountain" setting surely lends to this, but I've been to lots of "mountain" areas and never seen anything like this.
But the question I've been meaning to bring to this group for a while is about old axes without embossing. Why do they exist? When I find one that is pretty clearly not modern...maybe double bit or hewing...or maybe obvious from the handle and hang) with no indication of the maker, I wonder why?
If all of the "good" axe makers embossed even their lower products, why wouldn't other makers do this as well? It seems safe to assume that some of these would have been equal to or even better tools than the embossed brands. Is it just as simple as to say that some companies didn't understand marketing? That seems unlikely to me. Did the Kelly's, Collins, Plumb, Sagers of the world sometimes produce their axes without embossing? Would that imply that these are their lowest quality products?
I suppose some could actually be one-off handmade tools by a person who needed one, could run a forge and made his own, but that wouldn't explain the vast number of unmarked tools
I wonder if anyone knows why so many are here? The "mountain" setting surely lends to this, but I've been to lots of "mountain" areas and never seen anything like this.
But the question I've been meaning to bring to this group for a while is about old axes without embossing. Why do they exist? When I find one that is pretty clearly not modern...maybe double bit or hewing...or maybe obvious from the handle and hang) with no indication of the maker, I wonder why?
If all of the "good" axe makers embossed even their lower products, why wouldn't other makers do this as well? It seems safe to assume that some of these would have been equal to or even better tools than the embossed brands. Is it just as simple as to say that some companies didn't understand marketing? That seems unlikely to me. Did the Kelly's, Collins, Plumb, Sagers of the world sometimes produce their axes without embossing? Would that imply that these are their lowest quality products?
I suppose some could actually be one-off handmade tools by a person who needed one, could run a forge and made his own, but that wouldn't explain the vast number of unmarked tools