- Joined
- Dec 2, 2005
- Messages
- 69,168
In the 1990s I was a professional gear tester, and as a consequence I have a LOT of outdoor gear. Among many other things, I used to field-test boots for hiking, rock climbing, and mountaineering, and sometimes if I was sent the wrong size, a model changed, or my schedule changed for some reason, I wouldnt even wear them, so Id either give them away or put them away for when my days of free boots were over. I still have at least a dozen pairs of various types of outdoor footwear stored away, still in the boxes, theyre between 15 and 17 years old, and today I got out a new pair. They were a pair of nice looking suede hiking boots, which were sent in the wrong size, and I thought Id give them to a pal for his birthday. They have a dual density Vibram sole unit, and I noticed straightaway that the softer part had a shiny look to it, it was also tacky to the touch. I gave it a wipe with a cloth and a piece just broke off, the rubber was really fragile. I checked the rest of the boots I have stored, and what I found is that the boots with dual-density soles have all gone the same way. The dual-density sole unit of a pair of high-end combat boots, which Id worn a few times, but not for about 5 years, had gone completely as had the harder outer sole, and the rubber rand, the whole sole had almost disintergrated. However, the other boots with standard (mainly Vibram) sole units are fine, as are the butyl rubber soles of my climbing shoes. Guess I shouldnt have hung onto these boots so long as I now have to throw out a few pairs of otherwise perfect boots. Anyone else had this kind pf problem? The type of sole unit I'm talking about is not the sort with a hard outsole and an EVA (or similar) wedge, like on a trainer or approach shoe, but a monobloc sole unit with a hard outsole and what should be a slightly softer section behind this.