I got an old Plumb BSA hatchet off ebay. All the usual good stuff of chipped handle and poll that's been used for pounding - but it was cheap and the edge has never been sharpened other than with a stone.
The thing that struck me immediately was the head weight. I wonder why anyone would consider an 18 oz head to be an optimal belt axe? The Norlund hatchet and GB come out to 20oz total - which means about a 13oz head. And these seem an ideal compromise betwen chopping and carrying. I would have thought that a lighter head would have been better suited to young people. Maybe given the fact that the poll is hardened, and yet many of these hatchets show considerable pounding damage - shows that weight for using as a hammer was a good idea.
Naturally the second thing that struck me was the thickness of the face of the axe. Made for durability and splitting I guess - but the way the face is shaped makes for easier profiling.
Those are design criteria - Plumb made the hatchets that way because someone decided that's what a hatchet should be. Does anyone have any background on this?
I guess that this would have been considered a cheap hatchet in its time, and outclasses anything that I've seen in hardware stores lately - well in the last thirty years... The steel appears well tempered and of good hardness. It's also a well finished head. The handle was unfortunately unusable, and I drilled it out. The alignment was good though, and it was properly wedged. The grain of the wood in the handle was vertical. Altogether it would have been what we now consider an excellent wilderness hatchet other than for the design.
It's sure going to be interesting to see what this hatchet will do when rehandled.
Does anyone have any experience with these hatchets?
The thing that struck me immediately was the head weight. I wonder why anyone would consider an 18 oz head to be an optimal belt axe? The Norlund hatchet and GB come out to 20oz total - which means about a 13oz head. And these seem an ideal compromise betwen chopping and carrying. I would have thought that a lighter head would have been better suited to young people. Maybe given the fact that the poll is hardened, and yet many of these hatchets show considerable pounding damage - shows that weight for using as a hammer was a good idea.
Naturally the second thing that struck me was the thickness of the face of the axe. Made for durability and splitting I guess - but the way the face is shaped makes for easier profiling.
Those are design criteria - Plumb made the hatchets that way because someone decided that's what a hatchet should be. Does anyone have any background on this?
I guess that this would have been considered a cheap hatchet in its time, and outclasses anything that I've seen in hardware stores lately - well in the last thirty years... The steel appears well tempered and of good hardness. It's also a well finished head. The handle was unfortunately unusable, and I drilled it out. The alignment was good though, and it was properly wedged. The grain of the wood in the handle was vertical. Altogether it would have been what we now consider an excellent wilderness hatchet other than for the design.
It's sure going to be interesting to see what this hatchet will do when rehandled.
Does anyone have any experience with these hatchets?