Brief Chinook Review

Mitchell Knives

Knifemaker
Moderator
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
May 21, 2000
Messages
6,241
Hi. I got my Chinook. I had one before but, traded it to someone for a Starmate since they are now discontinued. Now that I've had some time to play with this beast, I'll give my initial impressions.


The fit and finish of this knife is very good. Every thing lines up perfectly and no sharp edges. One of the grinds is off by just a tiny, tiny fraction near the tip. It's no big deal and hardly noticiable.

The knife locks up fine...really inspires confidence. This is by far the most robust lockback I've ever seen. I really don't have any doubts about the lock. The dual steel liners are a nice touch too. As expected, there is a little vertical blade play. However, the horizontal axis is fine. Since the Chinook was designed to have a little play, it dosn't bother me. The blade was razor sharp out of the box. The action is about right, although I tightened the tension to suit my preferences.

The Chinook defiently weighs more than some of my other knives but, it is not too heavy...don't let the weight concern put you off from buying this knife. It seems to be very balanced, allowing for better manipulation.

I'm familiar with James Keating's work, and understand why he designed the Chinook like this. It's sort of like a mini bowie knife, and due to the excellent lock, you could probably do back cut techniques. This knife also feels great in reverse grip. Because of the shape of the blade, the knife could sort of be used like a claw in this manner.

The Chinook is defiently and excellent tactical blade. I also think it will make a pretty good utility knife as well. The huge belly should make for easy pushcuts, and the overall construction will make it an excellent hard use folder.

All in all I'm pretty happy with the knife. It does what it was designed for and then some. I'll probably be using it for general EDC and as a backup defensive knife. I wish that about a centimeter of the false edge had been sharpened...it would really aid in backcutting. Although I understand that blade play was inevitable, I still wish it didn't have any. I would defiently recommend this knife to anyone looking for something tougher than your average folder.
 
You mentioned that the Chinook was designed to have a little blade play..

I have not heard that before. Mine has some vertical play as well..

That his the only thing that I don't like about it..

Can you expand on that point?

Anybody else know anything about this??
 
Bob - I was told by Sal that the play is a result of the type of lockback used in the Chinook. Spyderco found that the strongest lockback design allowed for a small amount of play. I suspect that if the tolerences were so tight that there was no blade play, the realiability of the lock would go down. If you do a search for something like "Chinook play", you should find more info. I like the Chinook a lot, but the small amount of blade play bothers me a little bit. The trade off is that I know the lock is extremely strong and able to handle whatever I throw at it. I usually end up carrying it everyday. I've found that the large belly makes it an excellent style tactical knife.
 
Has Spyderco ever took a stance on if the folder is supposed to be able to withstand backcuts?

-Cliff
 
I don't think Spyderco endorsed doing back cuts with the Chinook. I've tried it with mine on cardboard. Since the back tip isn't sharpened, it tears instead of cuts. I did a bunch of hard backcuts and the lock was fine. I'd like to see someone do some heavy duty testing on the Chinook's lock strength. I wish Spyderco had sharpened the swedge.
 
Back
Top