Yesterday I decided to take a trip into the woods. I did not find my Gransfors mini hatchet, but I brought the military which I got a couple days ago.
In order to split small pieces of firewood I used a stick as a baton and twakked the tip of the knife, which resulted in the lock failing! I felt like a hundred dollars worth of horse manure!
End of story I made kindling by twakking on the other side of the stick, over where the hole is in the blade. This resulted in the stop pin tearing up the handle scale!
So now there is a lot of fore-aft play, some side to side play, and the lock will open with a slight tap on the spine.
Talk about expensive finger-guillotine! Tell me again that you would give this to your kid going to the army? I suppose "it was not made for this use"?
I have not tested it much yet, but I do think I like the shape of this knife, although it feels odd with a forward-swept blade. Repairing it without increasing the strength significantly won't make any sense to me, if I wanted a letter-opener I could grow longer nails!
Spyderco representatives: My theory is that the linerlock is pushed out of the way because the surface between it and the tang is inclined, ie not ninety degrees to the knife's longitudal axis.
Why is it inclined? Is it in order to create less fore aft blade play, or is it to make the lock fail before the knife is damaged? Seems silly to me to have a weak link there, I'd rather have a broken knife than loose my fingers!
I just discovered that if I bend the knife sideways, the linerlock also moves out of the way, so that I can actually close the knife using my two hands only, without pushing on the lock.
Before this discovery I was thinking that some slight modifications (metal loadspreading liners, and filing the surfaces where the blade and lock contacts to ninety degrees) might make a safe knife out of it, but now I think an entirely new locking mechanism might be necessary!
The fore aft play that my knife has now I think stems from the stop pin being knocked out of location. [EDIT: on the side with the linerlock there is probably adequate reinforcement, but on the other scale the G10 is torn up and the pin is moved a bit. How about having steel insert both sides instead of only one?]
The side play, I suspect that the pivot pin heads has compressed the scales? [EDIT: when I tightened the pivot screw the side play stopped.]
I do like the low thermal conductivity and capacity, grip, and light weight of the G10 handle, but I think some better load spreading is in order in such a construction as this!
[EDIT: upon starting to disassemble the knife, I noticed the pivot pin female threaded part is a bit disformed, where it is filed flat (in order to stop rotation). How about using a bit larger pivot pin, and or not file as much off of it, and or not place the flat (thinnest) part in a direction where it is most exposed to compressive forces against the liner?)
In order to split small pieces of firewood I used a stick as a baton and twakked the tip of the knife, which resulted in the lock failing! I felt like a hundred dollars worth of horse manure!
End of story I made kindling by twakking on the other side of the stick, over where the hole is in the blade. This resulted in the stop pin tearing up the handle scale!
So now there is a lot of fore-aft play, some side to side play, and the lock will open with a slight tap on the spine.
Talk about expensive finger-guillotine! Tell me again that you would give this to your kid going to the army? I suppose "it was not made for this use"?
I have not tested it much yet, but I do think I like the shape of this knife, although it feels odd with a forward-swept blade. Repairing it without increasing the strength significantly won't make any sense to me, if I wanted a letter-opener I could grow longer nails!

Spyderco representatives: My theory is that the linerlock is pushed out of the way because the surface between it and the tang is inclined, ie not ninety degrees to the knife's longitudal axis.
Why is it inclined? Is it in order to create less fore aft blade play, or is it to make the lock fail before the knife is damaged? Seems silly to me to have a weak link there, I'd rather have a broken knife than loose my fingers!
I just discovered that if I bend the knife sideways, the linerlock also moves out of the way, so that I can actually close the knife using my two hands only, without pushing on the lock.
Before this discovery I was thinking that some slight modifications (metal loadspreading liners, and filing the surfaces where the blade and lock contacts to ninety degrees) might make a safe knife out of it, but now I think an entirely new locking mechanism might be necessary!
The fore aft play that my knife has now I think stems from the stop pin being knocked out of location. [EDIT: on the side with the linerlock there is probably adequate reinforcement, but on the other scale the G10 is torn up and the pin is moved a bit. How about having steel insert both sides instead of only one?]
The side play, I suspect that the pivot pin heads has compressed the scales? [EDIT: when I tightened the pivot screw the side play stopped.]
I do like the low thermal conductivity and capacity, grip, and light weight of the G10 handle, but I think some better load spreading is in order in such a construction as this!
[EDIT: upon starting to disassemble the knife, I noticed the pivot pin female threaded part is a bit disformed, where it is filed flat (in order to stop rotation). How about using a bit larger pivot pin, and or not file as much off of it, and or not place the flat (thinnest) part in a direction where it is most exposed to compressive forces against the liner?)