- Joined
- Dec 30, 2000
- Messages
- 3,805
Because of a really good price (and rebate), I acquired my first new Buck 110 (with Idaho markings) in many years. I'd not been inspired to get one because I've fallen prey to the allure of more modern folders, plus the 420HC steel did not appeal to me.
Now that I've used it a bit, I am reminded of a few things.
1. There really isn't a large folder that feels better in the hand during use, with the possible exception of the Buck 112. I love Spydercos and Cold Steel Voyagers, and a variety of others, but nothing has the feel of a Buck folding hunter.
2. The blade geometry is superior to 99.99% of the knives on the market. The primary edge bevel on mine was not done well, but it only took about 15 minutes to get it into decent shape. This is unusal for Bucks 110s and 112s in my experience, so I hope others will be better. In any case, the thin edge is just perfect for slicing.
3. While I'm still no fan of 420HC, Buck's heat treatment is first rate and seems to at least minimize the weaknesses displayed by other applications of 420-series in less knives. It is certainly hard enough to take a very sharp edge, although edge retention is not something I've tested as I retouch it after just about every significant use.
4. The combination of 420HC and Buck's heat treatment beat the 440C and its poor heat treatment in my Buck Hilo handily. It's no news to most of us, but proper heat treatment is far more important (within reason) than which steel is used.
I'm very happy with this knife, and while it's not as handy as a lightweight, one-handed folder that clips in my pocket, it certainly has its own advantages. For actual use (as opposed to carry), I think it would be tough to beat the ergonomics of the 110/112.
I think I may have to go ahead and splurge for one of those 110s from Cabela's with better steel!
Now that I've used it a bit, I am reminded of a few things.
1. There really isn't a large folder that feels better in the hand during use, with the possible exception of the Buck 112. I love Spydercos and Cold Steel Voyagers, and a variety of others, but nothing has the feel of a Buck folding hunter.
2. The blade geometry is superior to 99.99% of the knives on the market. The primary edge bevel on mine was not done well, but it only took about 15 minutes to get it into decent shape. This is unusal for Bucks 110s and 112s in my experience, so I hope others will be better. In any case, the thin edge is just perfect for slicing.
3. While I'm still no fan of 420HC, Buck's heat treatment is first rate and seems to at least minimize the weaknesses displayed by other applications of 420-series in less knives. It is certainly hard enough to take a very sharp edge, although edge retention is not something I've tested as I retouch it after just about every significant use.
4. The combination of 420HC and Buck's heat treatment beat the 440C and its poor heat treatment in my Buck Hilo handily. It's no news to most of us, but proper heat treatment is far more important (within reason) than which steel is used.
I'm very happy with this knife, and while it's not as handy as a lightweight, one-handed folder that clips in my pocket, it certainly has its own advantages. For actual use (as opposed to carry), I think it would be tough to beat the ergonomics of the 110/112.
I think I may have to go ahead and splurge for one of those 110s from Cabela's with better steel!