Buck 119 Testing

Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
1,383
Here is a repost of a thread I have on bcusa, figured you guys might like to see it too.

I've owned a buck 119 for over a decade but never really used it for much more than a loaner knife or to skin animals. I looked up reviews and there seems to be alot of complaints about breakage, brittle steel, lack of edge holding, etc so I figured I'd do my own test and see how well it works.

The one complaint I found kinda funny was the whole brittle steel thing, I think alot of people think its cheap feeling because of the weight(or lack thereof). It's got aluminum fittings and a phenlonic handle, of course it's not gonna weigh as much as a full tang with micarta or a knife with brass fittings.

First off a pose of the knife on my backpack. Nice looking blade.
buck1191.jpg


I used it for chopping first, this really isn't a strong point. It's too light for serious chopping even though it can make quick work of wrist sized stuff.
buckchop1.jpg


Goes through smaller stuff easily.
buckchop2.jpg


Quicker and easier to just baton the knife through branches.
buckbaton1.jpg

buckbaton2.jpg


baton3.jpg

baton4.jpg


Not the prettiest fuzz sticks...but they do their job.
buckshavings1.jpg

buckshavings2.jpg


Used it for a little bit of notching/trap making. I really liked the thin tip, easy to get into tight places.
bucknotches.jpg


Fishing spear, very easy and effective.
fishingspear.jpg


Still shaving sharp after a day of work.
shavingsharp.jpg


It's not a big bad chopper and it's not the knife you wanna beat through seasoned knotty hardwoods, but it's still quite capable. The handle can also get kinda slippery when wet.

It does take a great edge though and holds it well. The handle fits my hand like a glove, the blade is light and nimble which makes it feel more natural when carving. It also rides very low profile on your belt and doesn't weigh much so you don't notice it til you need it.

My overall opinion is a positive one, I would feel confident carrying a buck 119 as my primary blade.
 
You can read all sorts of things on the internet which just are not true. The model 119 being an example. This model thru the years has been offered in many different steels, 440C, 425, ATS-34, BG-42 and S30V.
Its a good knife to have camping, hunting and around the house. For a chopper, not many knives work well. If they do they're mostly only good for that task. Good work on the activities and write up. DM
 
I wanted a 119 for many years and finally got one one 2001. Since then I have bought a couple more as well as a 619 which is the same knife with a different handle that doesn't get slippery when it is wet or greasy. They are great knives for the money and I am sure I will always have a few around.
 
You can read all sorts of things on the internet which just are not true. The model 119 being an example. This model thru the years has been offered in many different steels, 440C, 425, ATS-34, BG-42 and S30V.
Its a good knife to have camping, hunting and around the house. For a chopper, not many knives work well. If they do they're mostly only good for that task. Good work on the activities and write up. DM

By far mostly in 440C, 425M and 420HC. Just a few in ATS and BG.

I know there was a rumor of a 119 in S30V.......but wasn't that the project that went invisible due to problems with that steel?

Powder steels don't seem to work out well in big, heavy use knives that tend to get a lot of rough treatment.

Better for light use...... skinning, etc.
 
Thanks very much for taking the time to prove yet again that this knife is still an American Classic. Great pics too. Thanks for sharing.:thumbup:
 
In the 800 Signature Series alone there were a thousand made and many 119's(819) and all had S30V steel. So, it's no rumor. The part about powder metal not doing this or that is. Besides this area of discussion is not part of the topic. The usefulness of a 119 is. DM
 
Glad yall enjoyed the review. Anyone know which year Buck started making the 119 with 420hc?

As far as S30V is concerned I think it would make a fine steel for the 119. I've got a CRK GB I haven't been kind to and it's held up fine.
 
In the 800 Signature Series alone there were a thousand made and many 119's(819) and all had S30V steel. So, it's no rumor. The part about powder metal not doing this or that is. Besides this area of discussion is not part of the topic. The usefulness of a 119 is. DM

You brought it up. You said S30V 119......not 819.

The rumored S30V 119 project, though.......apparently went black and nothing more was heard about it.

Just keeping the record straight.

:)
 
No, an 819 is an 819 and a 119 is a 119. Two different knives.

For review: Here is an 819. As you can see, it is not a 119.

bu819ss.jpg


No need to get all defensive.

:)
 
Good review:thumbup:!I like packing my 119 in the woods,even now.It is an American classic,and I love the light weight.
 
It is undoubtedly the epitome of the "all-around."

It can do a little bit of everything and has ample strength.

Funny, I never thought of it as being light in weight.
 
Yes,a nice feild test,but it didn't cover ANYTHING that the 119 was designed to do,its a hunting knife,not a hachet,its meant to gut,skin,quarter game,make supper and thinmgs like that in camp,definately not designed for pounding/prying/beating through trees.I have domne all those things with a 119 myself,LOL.I have seen a 119 break in 2 pieces right at the end of the blood groove ,metal looked like it was full of bubbles,almost looked cast.
 
It was meant to just be a field test, razorblades, we all already know it's a good hunting knife.

In my opinion it makes a great field knife.
 
It is a good knife to use on many and varied chores. When Hunting season opens we can fill in the gaps. DM
 
I wouldn't use on as a heavy chopper ,if you've seen one without the handle,you'll notice its a full tang but the tang in the handle is not heavy duty ,its very thin.
 
Back
Top