Originally posted by ZENGHOST
I had a BM720 about a year ago that I sold off and now I EDC a Buck/Mayo. Never had them both at the same time to compare them, though. The Buck is definitely a lot lighter--I barely even notice that it's there. I'd say that the handle on the BM is a lot more comfortable because it fills the hand more, but that also means that it (720) is bulkier in the pocket. That's also not to say that the Buck handle isn't comfortable, but the corners could use some smoothing out on the one that I have. Both are extremely sharp, but the Buck edges out the 720 in steel, but ATS34/154CM is one of my favorite steel types so it's not like the steel is bad on the BM. I also think that I prefer the thinner blade of the Buck over the 720. The BM wins hands down in the lock department because of the axis lock (Buck is frame lock). The tip on the blade is a bit higher than I'd like on both knives, but it didn't really hamper me. I've seen the Buck drop as low as $140 on the forums and it's definitely worth the money. I paid $150 and it was well worth what I paid. You might also want to check out the passaround forum for the reviews in the Buck/Mayo passaround thread. If you can--just go and pick one up and mess around with it--that's the best way to choose.