Buck Selkirk review - sheath discussion

Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
126
Brief review-

The knife itself is really very good. Flawless and sharp. The flat grind lets it get very close to the material being cut so it can do things like shave off the smooth layer of some scrap leather without gouging resulting in very fine nearly transparent peelings.

The plastic sheath has good retention which appears to be adjustable with a Chicago screw set at the mouth of the sheath.

The belt loop element of the sheath is a bit more problematic. It is a clever design which has a spacer to choose for wide or narrow belt and the array of Chicago screws allow for re-orienting the sheath for horizontal carry.
I have not seen or read any reviews of anyone doing this and I wanted to try horizontal carry on my daypack hipbelt.

The belt loop is secured to the sheath envelope with a series of Chicago screws. One is extra long and has a spacer collar. The others are the same length.

The picture instructions Buck includes with the knife have a single too-dark picture of the sheath and some line drawings of how to align the Chicago screws in both orientations.

Unfortunately, the nature of the screws, the holes, and the sockets for the screw heads make this change really, really fiddly. I wound up having to put the firesteel socket in a different order than the instructions stated because I simply couldn't get all the bits to align.

Two of the Chicago screws are used to hold the belt clip to an intermediate Z shaped flat. The nuts are too thick resulting in being unable to cinch down the screws so they don't wobble in the retainer.

Another concern is that tightening all these screws is a problem because the nuts have nothing to keep them from turning against the slick plastic. Needle-nose pliers help a little but result in more fiddly slippage and droppage. (this is a bench job - not a field job)

Finally, tightening the screws in the field would be a real problem because not only are needle-nose needed, but the can opener type flat blade screw driver one would likely have in the field probably wouldn't fit thru the holes to reach the screw heads.
I don't want to use Loctite because I might want to reorient the sheath and with no purchase on the Chicago screw nut heads, this might prove extra difficult to reverse.

My final gripe isn't so much about Buck as about the vendor I purchased from. The place is best known for selling reloading components. They ship knives in a much-too-large 24"x24" padded envelope. This means that the knife box moves around a LOT in transit and a heavier knife, such as the Selkirk or Brahma, can burst thru the end of the thin Buck cardboard box both damaging the box and resulting in the knife floating freely in the bag.
I'd earlier traded emails with the Customer Service dept regarding this result with my Brahma but they claim it's too hard to write a packaging spec. (I called BS on this because I have written packaging specs myself but nothing changed.)
Neither knife was damaged but both boxes were a mess so from a collector standpoint this supplier should be avoided. (Lighter knives such as Paklite Caper come thru just fine due to their very low mass inside the fabric sheath inside the box.)

A Ka-Bar Foliage Green ordered and shipped this same way came thru with less box damage as Ka-Bar uses a bit more robust cardboard.

My $.05 worth.
 
I like mine, for a light bushcraft knife, but when I reversed the sheath for left hand carry, it was a bit of a wrestling match, but eventually I got everything together.
 
What's the deal with Buck's 420hc from non-US knives? On the Buck website is says the 420hc on the Selkirk is BOS heat treated. Anyone know if this is the case?
 
In Buck's catalog it states the steel is 420HC, even though this model is not made in USA. But looking through it, -- several knives not made in the U.S. state the steel as 420HC. This is because in the foreign contract the closest steel to 420HC is used. I think it's meaning among the steels there's not much difference. The catalog doesn't state it is Bos heat treated. DM
 
Thanks for the review. I recently purchased the Selkirk and haven't taken the time to go over it more than just a quick check for overall fit and finish, both of which I found very satisfactory. Perhaps this weekend I can check mine out in more detail.
 
I'll drop these here for those interested - a customer/lurker found this thread and contacted me for a UKE 2.0, here is his e-mail with pics of the Selkirk mounting to the stock-attachment vs UKE:

Here are a few before and after pics - you can see how I tried dropping it with paracord (which put it at the height i like, but just dangled around too much).

thumb_IMG_4875_1024.jpg
thumb_IMG_4876_1024.jpg
thumb_IMG_4877_1024.jpg


This is how it's meant to be worn from the factory

thumb_IMG_4880_1024.jpg


and how it was worn with the paracord -

thumb_IMG_4883_1024.jpg


and now with the UKE 2.0 ... ... I'm really liking the slimmer profile.

thumb_IMG_4938_1024.jpg
thumb_IMG_4939_1024.jpg
thumb_IMG_4942_1024.jpg
thumb_IMG_4931_1024.jpg
 
Agree with entire review.
Especially:
"The nuts are too thick resulting in being unable to cinch down the screws so they don't wobble in the retainer."
"this is a bench job - not a field job"
Very nice knife though, feels good in the hand, and is well finished.
The sheath works well once you get it how you want it - but wow, is it fiddly to set up!!
 
Back
Top