
A folding one, waved. I looked around, considered options, and settled on an Emerson. Why? You all know - reputation for performance and functional design, first-rate materials and build...
The only questions were Combat or Super, SF or BT.
So how did I end up with combat-SF AND super-BT... and a fixed blade? And a trainer...

And while I was shopping around I came across a knife I have been looking for and sort of forgot about - the SARK (partially serrated, SF). Most rescue knives are sheepfoot blades that are too broad at the tip to fit into tight spaces (body and webbing for example), and there is a sharp corner. I have been looking for a blade with a blunt, but not too wide tip and did not even realize Emerson made one until I started looking around for a Kbit. So I got a SARK too.
Now, I am a long-time spyderco user and that will not change - my grail knife is a PM2 with CF scales and S90V blade. And I have one and carry it every day, except when I am swapping out for my other PM2s! But I like to try out other knives too and have a bunch of nice fixed blades and a lot of folders, mostly spydercos. So why did I also just buy a Gentleman Jim? And why is the ETAK-A so interesting? Thank goodness I haven't seen one for sale... And that ZT-Emerson collab looks pretty interesting too!
But I'm done for now. I think.
