Appreciate the replies gentlemen, thanks for your input.
Now the clarification...
I'm aware of the CQC sale-yes they are great deals, too good in fact!
As of late I have chosen three Greco's to carry\use-Cub Companion, MST II-5, and the Falcon folder.
The Cub and the Falcon are both .210" thick steel, 01 and 8670 respectively, and the MST II is 1/4" A2 steel.
My question is whether or not someone who has used the thicker bladestock Greco knives has also used the thinner (.134") bladestock Danglers?
It has become very obvious\very fast to me that thicker bladestock knives are not as efficient slicers\cutters as the thinner stocked knives I am used to. I'm sure many members here are already aware of this, so forgive my ignorance. To put this in perspective my thickest FB prior to owning the Greco MST was a KA-BAR USMC fighting knife, followed by an Ontario Mil-Spec machete. My thickest blade folder before I picked up the Falcon?-the BM AFCK.
This brings us back to the Greco Danglers-seems that the much thinner .134" bladestock would naturally be a more efficient EDC type utility blade, while the heavier\thicker knives would be more suited to a combat\survival\SD role.....
I'd really like to see John offer two versions of his more popular sellers-one in .210" and one in .134" (or even 1/8")
Opinions?
sorry to drag this out
Mongrel