Camp Tramp from Swamp Rat Knives

Cliff Stamp

BANNED
Joined
Oct 5, 1998
Messages
17,562
Specifications :

This is a 7 1/2" bowie style blade, made by stock removal out of SR101 ("enhanced" 52100), with a synthetic grip of "Resiprene C". The blade is differentially hardened to enhance the durability and flexibility with a spring tempered spine for strength. The primary grind is high sabre flat and tapers to a light convex edge which is difficult to distinguish from flat by eye. The edge is about 0.058" thick and ground at slightly below 16 degrees per side for the main body of the blade and swelled out to ~18 degrees per side in the tip. The knife weighs 390 g and balanced about 2.2 cm in front of the handle, about an inch, so it has a decent blade heavy heft. It has a hard black crinkle coating which will enhance the corrosion resistance of the flats but of course offers no protection to the edge.

Stock testing :

The NIB edge sharpness was a little less than optimal scoring 207 +/- 22 g on light thread. A blazing sharp finish can approach ~100 g. The edge was able to shave, but scratched a little. The knife cut paper well on a slice but had little ability for such push cuts. The edge aggression was decent near the base, taking about 0.6 cm on 1/4" poly under a 1000 g load, however it was completely slick out near the tip and was unable to cut the poly even after a dozen back and forth passes (<0.25 cm is optimal). Checking the edge closely under magnification a slight roll was present.

Push cutting 3/8" hemp the knife required between 31-33 lbs out near the tip, and up to 41-43 lbs near the base. The force is higher near the base as more of the edge is in contact with the cutting board as there is little curvature along the edge at that point. The level of slicing aggression is decently high, the knife was able to slice through the rope on a two inch draw using only 24-26 lbs much reduced from its push cutting performance. On pointing sections of hardwood dowel the blade performed very well and was able to rough off the necessary wood in only 7.9 +/- 1.0 slices.

[these were repeated after the blade was sharpened to a high polish, no significant difference (< 5%) in cutting ability was induced]

A quick comment on slicing aggression, using rolls of cotton fabric I did some slicing with the Camp Tramp as compared to an Opinel and Twistmaster, with both folders having very aggressive finishes, left rough by a 100 grit AO belt. Both folders could cut the fabric on a slice with much less passes than the Swamp Rat blade, but when I just pressed all the blades through the material the Camp Tramp jumped ahead. This is the tradeoff of blade finish, leave it coarse and the slicing ability jumps ahead but the push cutting ability goes down.

[later on I tested the Camp Tramp on that material with a 600 DMT edge finish, the slicing ability had improved many times to one, but the push cutting ability decreased as well, though not as much]

The Camp Tramp chops at about 55 (4) % of the Tramontina bolo on small wood, scrap as well as felled wood (2-3" pine and spruce mainly). The Tramontina bolo is in the same class as the Gransfors Bruks Wildlife Hatchet so it is a high baselines for ten inch class blades not to mention seven inch ones. The Camp Trap was slightly more fluid in the wood, but this wasn't a real advantage time wise as it could not overcome the time or effort disadvantage of the significantly lower penetration. After the chopping, which was done in the cold (~0 F), the Camp Tramp could still shave, but needed more of a slice / draw, and could still slice newsprint well. The Bolo had significant visible edge damage after both chopping sessions.

In regards to the rippling on the Bolo this is just a case of low quality and/or soft steel limiting cutting performance. If both blades were used for extended periods of time without sharpening the Camp Tramp would pull ahead due to the edge staying in much better shape. I repaired the damage on the bolo as soon as it happened which meant stopping the cutting, as otherwise the damage would grow with successive impacts. You could of course raise the edge angle on the Bolo or simply chop with less force, but that would raise the relative ability of the Camp Tramp significantly.

The point on the Camp Trap while quite robust given its geometry (no extended clip) has very solid penetration due to the military or penetrator tip. This is essentially small sharpened section of the spine only a quarter inch or so long. Using a phone book to gauge its abilities, I ran into a problem as it would go through the book, all 864 pages, the best I have seen so far. The point is also by no means weak. I then dug through a 2x4 with 28 stabs in under three minutes. This was going as hard as I could with the only limit on the prying being that I had to hold the wood down with my other hand.

[this needs to be repeated when I get a few more phone books and some scrap]

For comparison, the CU/7 from Camillus could could section the 3/8" hemp requiring between 40-44 lbs on the flat blade section near the choil, and 34-36 lbs near the tip. Pointing some ends on a hardwood dowel (basswood), the CU/7 took 9.9 +/- 0.4 cuts. On scrap and light woods, using a hook grip around the end of the handle, it performed at 28 +/- 2 % of the Tramontina bolo, with a full grip around 20 +/- 3 %. So in short, the Camp Tramp cuts as well as the CU/7 and chops more than twice as well. The point penetration abilities are similar with the Camp Tramp's point being far stronger, however outside of full strength prying the tip on the CU/7 isn't likely to break. The Camp Tramp also has a choil to allow neutral balance gripping for light work, though I had to do some work to make this one more comfortable, round it out a little.

[the blade had been sharpened before the following usage]

Kitchen

Using the knife on trimming fats, cutting up meats and the like it did as well as any of the other kitchen blades I had as these kinds of tasks are just determined by the sharpness and since I had sharpened all the blades they were equal in that regard. The same goes for soft fruits and vegetables. It is however awkward for many of the precision tasks such as peeling potatoes, and because of the blade thickness it can fracture stiffer vegetables if you try to get thin slices. For reference it can cut a medium sized carrot with 5-7 lbs, in comparison, a Japanese styles utility knife, at the extreme end of kitchen cutlery does it in 2.5 - 3 lbs.

Misc cutting

Cutting a variety of light materials like bubble wrap, plastics, paper and fabrics, the Camp Tramp did as well as any blade I had as these materials are too flimsy to exert any pressure on a blade so as long as it is sharp it will cut that kind of stuff very well. Using a couple of other blades as well, Patrol Machete and 52100 MEUK, 1/8 inch cardboard was sliced up. All the blades cut it very easily. No real preference exists in that respect. Moving on to 1/4 inch cardboard the force jumped ahead significantly and none of the blades did that well. The Patrol Machete would be favored simply because it allows a larger draw. I popped in with a Swiss Army Knife (Rucksack), which could not cut at all because it was lightly blunted, showing the extreme importance of sharpness. With a quick honing (a few passes on a crock stick), it was much ahead of the other blades. Cutting up some rubber tubing of various sizes, the performance was again similar with the Patrol Machete being significantly last because the curvature interferes with the cutting unless you attempt to "whittle" the tube to make the cut.

Using the Patrol Machete and the Camp Tramp for a bunch of wood and light vegetation cutting the distinction between the two was of course very large. Both could cut light vegetation with equal ease, but the Patrol Machete was just much longer and thus had better reach. The Camp Tramp could be used with the finger cutout to limit fatigue, but unless the work is over a long term usage of a lanyard and a rear grip tends to save time. Moving up to light wood like Alders the Patrol Machete had both better reach and much better penetration, far less bending and much more work done in a given time. However on harder wood work like limbing, the Camp Tramp can do it without problems, but I have had two Patrol Machetes suffer gross failures so it can't handle that class of work unless you go very light at which point it loses any penetration advantage over the Camp Tramp. Doing lighter wood work like making shavings and kindling in general, the Camp Tramp is much easier to handle and does many things much better (splitting and such) as it is much more robust both in blade body and in the tip.

Handle

The grip is made of a dense rubber like material which is more durable than Kraton, but far less than Micarta or G10. It has a decent texture (I would prefer it more aggressive but then comfort it decreased), and handles shock better than the more dense grip materials. It is contoured in all dimensions. It does have a couple of problems, and these are pretty much the only real weak points of the knife. The front of the grip is rather squarish and this really limits how much force you can use when cutting as the corners produce high pressure points quite rapidly with heavy cutting. The grip should ideally be blended into the blade so as to give a nice form fitting shape. A longer guard would also be nice for more security in extreme circumstances. The rear butt hook is a large positive being at enough of a slope to torque off of, but not so much that it is uncomfortable, it is also flared out to decrease pressure and thus raise comfort with extended usage, both attributes combine to increase the chopping ability among other aspects.

Sheath :

The sheath is Cordura with a Kydex insert. It came with a very tight fit. Nice pouch on the sheath with an elastic tie down. Secure and quality stitching.

-Cliff
 
How does the Camp Tramp compare to the Basic #7 you extensively reviewed? Specifically, how does the SR101 compare to to M-INFI in terms of durability, edge retention and ease of sharpening?

The edge geometery you listed for the SRKW is more acute than I remember the stock edge on my #7 being, which is a nice improvement.

Another point of interest is how the Camp Tramp compares to a much thinner blade of the same length. Something as simple as a $4 Ontario "old hickory" butcher's knife would be interesting.



The Tramontina bolo is in the same class as the Gransfors Bruks Wildlife Hatchet so it is a high baselines for ten inch class blades not to mention seven inch ones

Although not essential to this review, your statement in regards to the Tram bolo does not match my experience at all. A freshly sharpened Tram Bolo (with the edge layed on my belt sander) will only outclass a 10" knife in cutting light grasses in my hands. My CS Trailmaster (Custom) will easily outchop the Tram Bolo, as will a Busse Basic #9 and the Ontario RTAK.

The disparity between the chopping power of a good 10" blade and the Bolo grows quite large as the wood get thicker and harder. Though the Bolo is capable of decent penetration it binds so badly that it really is not even worth using, and the edge deforms so easily that I rarely even use it. I have bought several, and they are consitently poor in quality and execution.

I find that a small GB axe will readily outpace a 10" blade, so I don't consider the Tram Bolo to be anywhere close to the tool a small GB axe is.

The only large blade that I have used that can outchop a small axe is the Valiant Golok.

In general, I don't have a good opinion of the 7" class of blades. They are too big for easy carry, or for fine tasks, yet lack the mass or balance for chopping. Joe Talmadge has commented on this in the past as well.

For military use, however, the SRKW line looks ideal. Combining a good steel, good handle and a nice price. Since this was what the company set out to do, I'd say the succeeded very well. Given the price pint of this line, I don't see too much in the way of competition.

It will be very, very interesting to see how Jeff Randall's new 7" knife compares to the Camp Tramp.
 
Thanks for the detailed review, Cliff. A few questions:

1. Given the spring tempered spine, how would you expect it to hold up to 'hard' pounding (hammer, rock, etc.). The Busse Forum has a thread dealing with a Basic 9 under such conditions. I expect the CT to chip less than the Basic 9, though this is only speculation.

2. Did you reprofile the edge during your testing? Any comments on its appropriateness for hard use (limbing, chopping)? How easy was it to sharpen or touch-up?

3. How resistant is the knife to twisting while chopping? I'm not sure if you have used the Busse Ergo models but I would be interested in seeing how their handles compare for comfort and efficiency.
 
Very good review Cliff.

How dose the Camp Tramp compare to the other 7” combat/utility type knives on the market, such as the Steel Heart, the Cold Steel Recon Scout & Bush Ranger, the BK7, the SOG Seal and the Kabars? What are the strong and weak points of each as you see them? Thanks.


-Frank
 
Cliff - Good review. Your tests match my own experience with my Camp Tramp. These are good knives for the money. So are the Beckers, but I sold or gave away all my Beckers since the SRKW knives came out. I simply like the handles, blade profiles, choils, and steel better in the SRKW knives than I do the Becker knives.
 
Eric :

Specifically, how does the SR101 compare to to M-INFI in terms of durability, edge retention and ease of sharpening?

Ease of sharpening is mainly determined by geometry and steel suitability (durability and corrosion resistance mainly with wear resitance being a factor in rare cases). Essentially if the edge doesn't take gross damage of some sort, sharpening is easy. Both of the blades are high in that regard for general use, and the Basic even did well in wet enviroments, something I intend to look at with the Swamp Rats. The Basic got the highest marks I have ever heard in that regard from people using it, mainly though because of the physical state it was in, there were no reservations about cosmetic damage and thus people would not hesitate to pop in on a belt sander for a quick touch up, which is why it lost so much metal in so little time. In regards to edge retention, the above post by Mike confirms what I would expect. In regards to overall durability, the Basic was very extreme, time will tell on the Swamp Rat.

Another point of interest is how the Camp Tramp compares to a much thinner blade of the same length. Something as simple as a $4 Ontario "old hickory" butcher's knife would be interesting.

I have been intending to pick up a Hudson Bay knife or similar for a direct comparion/commentary for some time, but I have used various kitchen knives of that style for various utility tasks. The cutting ability on most things would be similar to the Camp Tramp (assuming you put a similar edge angle on the butcher knife), with binding materials like turnips and very thick cardboard giving the advantage to the butcher knife, and chopping going heavily to the Camp Tramp. The Camp Tramp would be far stronger, with a far more robust tip, but of course the butcher knife would be far lighter. The butcher knife would also sharpen faster given its much more narrow edge, but would be expected to go blunter faster as the steel is likely significantly softer, and far less abrasion resistant. For smaller knives, I prefer something fairly slight usually like the Deerhunter, but for larger knives I would rather a Camp Tramp than a Hudson Bay knife, it does of course simply depend on what you are doing. It is likely the case that with the large current tactical influence, most people are using knives that are over built for their needs and could benefit from trying some slighter blades.

The disparity between the chopping power of a good 10" blade and the Bolo grows quite large as the wood get thicker and harder. Though the Bolo is capable of decent penetration it binds so badly that it really is not even worth using, and the edge deforms so easily that I rarely even use it.

In regards to the above comment I made about chopping ability, it is in reference to raw penetration. I used to do timed runs to allow a comparison of binding as well, but as of late my technique has improved to the point where this isn't the issue it once was. I only have a problem now on 1/16" thick and under blades, I am still not at the point where they can be used on thick wood, and I actually doubt that they can . On really dense wood even the 1/8" machetes/bolos are not suitable because of vibration issues, but I don't cut a lot of that kind of wood. The Valiant Golok really fits in well there. Of course in general, it must be considered that an axes doesn't lose penetration on larger wood, but the blades will drastically. The above performance ratios only hold on wood that the blades can clear out from the start, which is 6-8" pine, and 3-4" spruce , oak and the like .

The only large blade that I have used that can out chop a small axe is the Valiant Golok.

I have used a couple of the survival models which are of similar weight and balance as the Tramontina bolo. The Golok has a more acute edge, but thicker body, and it all adds up to evens out to similar penetration. However the golok is *much* more fluid in the wood, and far less fatiguing as I chop with a completely different style. The golok gets a softer draw cut using the tip area of the blade, and the bolo a wrist heavy snap impacting just in front of the choil which is heavy on jarring. The Golok has a much more durable edge in the center of the blade than the Tramontina, but gets as easy to damage near the tip and base of the blade where the steel is much softer. The only real advantage of the Tramontina is the cost, but unless you are really scraping pennies, the Golok is a much better choice, even if you can't maintain the convex profile which isn't as much of a problem as it is often made out to be. They are very nice wood working optimised blades indeed. Combine one with a GB axe and say small puukko, and you have a really nice set of wood working tools for ~100$ . I am looking forward to the spring and the GB felling axe.

SteelDriver :


1. Given the spring tempered spine, how would you expect it to hold up to 'hard' pounding (hammer, rock, etc.). The Busse Forum has a thread dealing with a Basic 9 under such conditions. I expect the CT to chip less than the Basic 9, though this is only speculation.

Yes, the spine should be very resistant to fracture, though should suffer some impaction more readily. The edge however is possibly not as durable in extreme use. Something which I will see as time passes and the knife gets knocked around while it is out on loan.

2. Did you reprofile the edge during your testing? Any comments on its appropriateness for hard use (limbing, chopping)? How easy was it to sharpen or touch-up?

At first I had intended to reprofile the edge, but I was surprised at how acute it was and never found the need. Keeping it as a pure wood cutting blade, the edge angle could be reduced 10-30%, depending on the skill of the user, and the consistency of the wood. This would give a similar increase in light cutting, and about half as much on chopping. This wasn't enough to give a strong incentive to grind it, plus I had not done any durability work of an extreme sort, so I left it as NIB before I loaned it out for general "utility" work. The edge sharpened easily, as it took no gross damage, it was just stropped back to shaving. Only once did I have to use SiC paper to give the edge some more bite and then back to more stropping. I have reprofiled the Howling Rat, a review of which should be up shortly, and the steel works very easily, much more so than INFI.

3. How resistant is the knife to twisting while chopping? I'm not sure if you have used the Busse Ergo models but I would be interested in seeing how their handles compare for comfort and efficiency.

A lot of how a grip handles depends on how it fits in your hand and personal characteristics. For example, if you can grip the Project from Reeves tightly, it is very secure, however since it is checkered steel, it does take fairly durable hands to use it as essentially it is a wood rasp. The Swamp Rat grip has several advantages over the slabed handles of the Busse line, mainly because it is enclosed and thus no exposed metal surfaces for high heat transfer. In regards to pure ergonomics, as Mike noted the Swamp Rat grips are more impact absorbing. However edge profile makes a huge difference here, my old style BM has the worse of the group in regards to ergonomics, but because of the highly optimised edge profile, I would prefer it for most work. But, to be short for ergonomic and handling in general, a grip like the Swamp Rat would be preferred over a hard slabed handle. It does however give up a lot in regards to durability.

frank k :

How dose the Camp Tramp compare to the other 7~T combat/utility type knives on the market, such as the Steel Heart, the Cold Steel Recon Scout & Bush Ranger, the BK7, the SOG Seal and the Kabars? What are the strong and weak points of each as you see them? Thanks.

I commented on this in detail in the CU/7 thread :

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=194037

I would put the Camp Tramp above the Basic on the first list in that thread which was on my preferences, thus its ranked #1. On the second list which was heavy on durability, possibly tied with the Basic as it should be more flexible and more spine impact resistance, but possible less edge durable, so its tied for #3. And on the last list, I would put it tied as #1 as it cuts as well as the CU/7.

-Cliff
 
Dang, Cliff, nicely done! I was preparing to write up my Camp Tramp, BK7 & Basic 7 comparison, but I'm not sure I'd have anything to add.

Well, I do have some photos: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=245657

And a couple more here: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=244459

I might add that the Swamp Rat line of knives is a great leap forward from the Busse Basics. Jennifer & Jerry have really taken the idea of a hard-use, affordable knife to heart. The Basics were a good start, but the Swamp Rats are head and shoulders above them in terms of comfort, balance, blade design and overall useability. The only real question is how SR101 compares to M-INFI in extreme hard use.

The Beckers are simply amazing for their price range -- the best value out there, in my opinion. But the handles are a little uncomfortable and the balance is slightly off. Still an excellent knife for the money.

Stepping up to the Swamp Rats is about two and half times more expensive, but the increase in quality is more than worth it. Fit and finish are excellent, comfort is exemplary and the penetrator tip is just too damn cool.

Take care,
Chad
 
Chad Ward :

[Beckers]

But the handles are a little uncomfortable and the balance is slightly off.

I don't find the handle very suitable either, they are too slippery for me, and the balance is far too neutral. However a lot of people *love* neutral blades and really praise such a quality in a knife. It totally guts the chopping ability though. With the Camp Tramp you get the high chopping ability in a full grip, and the just use the index finger cutout for a neutral grip for lighter work, either machete type use, or precision cutting.

Stepping up to the Swamp Rats is about two and half times more expensive, but the increase in quality is more than worth it. Fit and finish are excellent, comfort is exemplary and the penetrator tip is just too damn cool

Yes, I could not agree more with the above. The military tip is just another example of innovation from Busse. It addresses the problems of the lower penetration with the robust profile on the older Busses, however without inducing the much lower strength of traditional clip points / swedge designs.

Really nice job on the pictures, very informative as were your recent comments. I look forward to more in the future.


-Cliff
 
Originally posted by Eric_Draven
In general, I don't have a good opinion of the 7" class of blades. They are too big for easy carry, or for fine tasks, yet lack the mass or balance for chopping. Joe Talmadge has commented on this in the past as well.
This is a good point, and one on which I'd have to agree in general terms for outdoor knives (as distinct from, say, kitchen knives).

Ergo, I've always been surprised how many people prefer the Busse Steel Heart over the Battle Mistress. :confused:

I guess maybe I'd rather have a 7" fighter blade for self defense in lieu of a bigger, heavier 9" blade (ignoring a .45acp or 12ga for this knife-related point)... but this example demonstrates that I'm grasping here trying to come up with an area where a 7" blade would be preferred.

Seems like I'm reaching for an 8" chef's knife by a factor of about 15x over a 6" kitchen ("sandwich") knife.

I guess I'd rather have a 6"-7" fillet knife than a 9" version, but that is because I rarely get to (have to) clean a bigass tuna.

But I digress... :yawn:
 
It seems to me that the Fallkniven A1 is a knife to consider in this set. Great steel, full tang, exposed at butt, decent scales, and kydex sheath.
 
rdangerer :

... I'm grasping here trying to come up with an area where a 7" blade would be preferred.

It is mainly an inbetween knife, some chopping and machete work, but more geared towards knife usage. They are much more efficient for precision cutting than the ten inch plus class knives. So if you are just carrying one knife, a lot of times the 7" one is more efficient, depending on where you are and what you are doing.

The ten inch class blades are also inbetween knives, but geared more towards machete and axe use. However while they can chop about as well as an quality hatchet on small woods, they are well behind machetes on light vegetation and small diameter woody brush, and two handed axes on large woods. They are however work a lot better as a knife than a long machete, and easily out perform a hatchet for a lot of such work as well.

A lot of it is also user dependent. When I first got the SHBM, it was fairly heavy in hand, and I preferred something lighter or more neutral for soft vegetation and small woods. However in the few years that I have had it, and used it extensivly, alongside much heavier knives (khukuris mainly), I now view it as the lightest I would want in a bowie of that size. I am still trying to get functional with machete type work with the 22" Ang Khola, that is a real wrist workout.

The Camp Tramp is still in constant heavy use, my brother has it now and is putting many miles on it.


-Cliff
 
Back
Top