- Joined
- Dec 7, 2000
- Messages
- 5,179
In the recent KI there was an article where the author made a valiant effort to define that point at which a person actually becomes a knifemaker. He mentioned a Guild show where early makers kind of agreed one had to have made at least 300 knives before he could assume the mantle of "cutler". The author, like I do, generally thought otherwise - it's a quality issue; quantity doesn't make a knifemaker, craftsmanship does.
Then last week I had the extreme good fortune to enjoy a visit from fellow forumite Ken Simmons. He's heard the demarkation between hobbiest and knifemaker can be stated as 12 knives per year.
Frankly I hadn't given either of these any real thought; I've always thought of myself as a knifemaker, albeit a lame one, a maker deeply in need of improved skills but fully graced with the blood of a cutler.
Now what? By the quality measure it'll be a long while before I can call myself a knifemaker
even though I get good money for my better knives; by the second measure I will probably be a knifemaker this year for the first time.
If I'm opening a can of worms with this I apologize up front. I call myself a knifemaker but wonder if I have the right to, alongside you folks most of whom certainly qualify by any standard.
Dave
Then last week I had the extreme good fortune to enjoy a visit from fellow forumite Ken Simmons. He's heard the demarkation between hobbiest and knifemaker can be stated as 12 knives per year.
Frankly I hadn't given either of these any real thought; I've always thought of myself as a knifemaker, albeit a lame one, a maker deeply in need of improved skills but fully graced with the blood of a cutler.
Now what? By the quality measure it'll be a long while before I can call myself a knifemaker

If I'm opening a can of worms with this I apologize up front. I call myself a knifemaker but wonder if I have the right to, alongside you folks most of whom certainly qualify by any standard.
Dave