The Leatherman bottle/can opener is horrible for beer bottles. It performed so poorly that I felt compelled to test its other presumed function; then I could denounce it completely. To my indignant surprise, the can opener performed very well. It opened a Progresso soup can both smoothly and efficiently with great piercing ability. I used the opener on the Wave and the Surge. The Surge's performed better still, same blade shape but slightly larger, with increased leverage (longer handle).
For comparison, I tested the openers on a few folders (all of the can opener blades were hook shaped).Until this test, I preferred the opener on the generic US Utility folder/Demolition knife (Camillus '95). The opener is the largest I have seen on a folder, the tip of the hook is very thin and it says "can opener" on it; hard to argue with that. Its thin tip pierces well.
The other openers were from the following: Victorinox Tinker, Ulster BSA (four blade, '82), Camco 450 (four blade, mid '60s). The Vic opener had always been awkward, since its diminutive blade was forward cutting. After a few attempts it would operate smoothly, but since the cutting arc was small it was not efficient. Also, the driver tip would overly penetrate and bind. However, it was a true multiple use blade: can opener, small flat/phillips screw driver, and since the cutting edge was external- scraper. The BSA opener was fine, better than the Vic's and almost as functional as the Demo's (and nostalgic as well).
So far none of the openers performed poorly, but the Leatherman's was surprisingly best. This changed when I used the Camco's, it was short, thick, and stout. The hole punched by the opener was twice as wide as the others, yet just as facile to operate. The simple, yet dated, design was fun to use. Too bad the need for a can opener is rare.
For comparison, I tested the openers on a few folders (all of the can opener blades were hook shaped).Until this test, I preferred the opener on the generic US Utility folder/Demolition knife (Camillus '95). The opener is the largest I have seen on a folder, the tip of the hook is very thin and it says "can opener" on it; hard to argue with that. Its thin tip pierces well.
The other openers were from the following: Victorinox Tinker, Ulster BSA (four blade, '82), Camco 450 (four blade, mid '60s). The Vic opener had always been awkward, since its diminutive blade was forward cutting. After a few attempts it would operate smoothly, but since the cutting arc was small it was not efficient. Also, the driver tip would overly penetrate and bind. However, it was a true multiple use blade: can opener, small flat/phillips screw driver, and since the cutting edge was external- scraper. The BSA opener was fine, better than the Vic's and almost as functional as the Demo's (and nostalgic as well).
So far none of the openers performed poorly, but the Leatherman's was surprisingly best. This changed when I used the Camco's, it was short, thick, and stout. The hole punched by the opener was twice as wide as the others, yet just as facile to operate. The simple, yet dated, design was fun to use. Too bad the need for a can opener is rare.
Last edited: