Okay, so I was being a little lazy in asking this

. In the passed I have found such good information here, both more thorough and more relevant than by randomly searching the wider net, I asked here here first without doing a lot of my own research.
I found a couple of what look like pretty thorough texts on the use of reamers and have probably answered my own question.
http://www.gammons.com/useofreamers.html
http://www.cobracarbide.com/technical_info.htm
These seem to be in agreement on the speeds and feed for carbide reamers.
Material.....................Speed (SFM)......Feed (IPR)
Steel Rc 20 and under...60-90 .............0.005" - 0.010"
Steel Rc 30 to 40.........35-65..............0.004" - 0.010"
Steel Rc 40 to 50.........20-40..............0.003" - 0.006"
Steel Rc 50 to 60.........15-30..............0.002" - 0.004"
Steel Rc 60 or higher.....8-20...............0.001" - 0.003"
(SFM = surface feet per minute. IPR = inch per revolution)
rpm = sfm/Tool Cicrumference
So for the 3/16th reamer I was asking about.
Diameter = 3/16" = 0.1875" = 0.0156'
Circumference = C = Pi x diameter = 0.0491'
For RC 58-60 rpm = 20/0.0497 = approx 400rpm
(which was a lot faster than I was expecting, and a lot faster than I had been using my HSS reamer.)
Feed, difficult to judge for a manual machine I guess, but assuming 0.002 inch per rev and 0.14" thickness that means I need to complete the operation in about 10.5 seconds.
I am still in two minds about clamping the blade down. All I have read say that carbide needs a solid set up to prevent chatter. These sources also say that carbide does not hold up well to mis-alignment and that a floating mount can be useful. I am leaning towards a compromise. I have an aluminium tooling block, about 1.5 inches thick with holes drilled and tapped for mini-toe clamps, reckon it weighs about 2lb and can clamp the blade to that, but leave the block free to move a little on the mill table to allow for misalignment.
Thanks for prodding me into doing my own research. Once I have digested the information on those two pages I will be much better off than I would have been had someone jumped in here and spoon fed me an answer.
