Ceramic knives might be nice in that they take an edge and hold it for a *long* time. But in the kitchen, especially when you gain enough knowledge about knives, this ironically becomes less and less of an issue as you cook more; the more you end up knowing about knives, a correspondingly greater knowledge of sharpening is usually acquired. Having worked in fine dining for a while, I can assure you that a lot of cooks can prepare foods with knives that I considered little better than 8 inch butter knives - but the food still tasted the same. Hell, if you got right down to it, I'm almost certain that I could do about 97% of kitchen cutting tasks with a guitar string wrapped around two handles. Having a sharp knife is more a matter of convenience and ease, rather than a necessity: a fact supported by the sheer number of people who lack knife knowledge, and end up using dull knives.
To answer your question more specifically, ceramic knives really only have two properties that are useful in the kitchen. The first, as I mentioned before is their edge retention, and the second is their corrosion resistance. Slicing lemons/limes and other acidic foods with PH's approaching 1 is a harsh environment for anything. However, the advantages of a ceramic knife, in my opinion, are offset by the amount of care that you have to put into them. They chip easily, are more fragile, much harder to sharpen, and are virtually guaranteed to shatter if you drop them.
On the subject of lettuce, a lot of people suggest not even cutting it at all. Cutting will cut cells, or crush them against the cutting board, which is what opens up the lysosomes for faster oxidation within the cell - this is what causes browning in fruits. If you tear the lettuce with your hands you can avoid the lettuce browning as quickly.