I have been evaluating the durability, effectiveness, and ergonomics of this prototype knife sharpener for about one month. I've been coming up with any method I can to wear down my edges quickly, so that I can resharpen as much as possible, and my body is bald from edge-testing. (I actually prefer it that way when I'm living in the outdoors a lot; it's easier to deal with cleaning, sunscreen, and mosquito repellent.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sharpener is about 1 inch wide, by 4 3/4 inches long, by 1/8 inch thick, with a deep V-shaped vertical groove running lengthwise down the middle of one side, and a hole drilled through the groove on one end. On my scale, it weighs exactly one ounce. It is made of an aluminum bar covered with fine ceramic.
I find the design to be very good, a very elegant solution to fusing the various design objectives required of the sharpener into a single object. Because it is flat, it has a maximum amount of usable surface area per volume (the opposite of a ceramic rod), making for plenty of usable sharpener space in an object small enough and light enough to fit into a BM-E, SH-E, or NO-E sheath pocket. The length is exactly long enough to just barely fit in the sheath pocket, and the width is just perfectly the widest you can go without making it a hassle to put into or withdraw from the sheath. The size, flatness, and smoothness allow for fitting lots else into your sheath. Because the edges are rounded, they can do double-duty sharpening Busse-style serrations, and triple duty as a rod for straightening edges. The V-shaped groove allows for fishing hook sharpening (didn't try it), and perhaps knife tip sharpening. So, it's very versatile. The size is just big enough for decent strokes of the blade over its surface, while still fitting comfortably in either the sheath pocket or pants pockets. The hole allows for keychain-type use. All in all, I like the design very much. My only concern about the design is that it is just slightly too long to fit into a sheath for the Satin Jack or Paul's Hatchet. (Which I want, Jerry!)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before I even came into possession of the sharpener, it came pre-durability-tested, compliments of the United States Postal Service. Apparently they didn't notice that there was a solid object in the envelope (which gives you some idea of how slender and light this sharpener is), and so they put it into some sort of sorting machine which requires bending. What I received from the post office wasn't an enveleope with a letter and a sharpener; I received a plastic bag with an apology from the Postal Service, filled with some shredded paper (Pieced together into an envelope and letter from Chuck)and a sharpener.
So how did the sharpener fare it's Postal Service-durability test? Beautifully: not a bend nor chip nor scratch--which impressed me, based on the extent of the damage to the paper part of the package.
I never did any destructive testing to the sharpener. I did the following: carry it in a pocket full of change for many hours over many days, carry it in a bag full of small camera gear and outdoor gear for many hours over about fifteen days, and sharpen with it a total of about 60 times.
Nothing chipped or significantly scratched the coating. Everything marked the coating with traces of metal worn off of the objects that bumped up against the sharpener. By the end of the testing period, the color of the sharpener had transformed from a bright white to a mottled grey, with considerable darkening on the edges. Also, the sharpener smoothed from about the texture of finished wood to about the texture of a fine China plate. The smoothening of the texture actually happened quite fast after very light use, but then stopped entirely for the rest of the testing period.
Overall, I was quite impressed with the durability. It seems that this sharpener should be able to handle many hundreds of sharpenings, and survive real field use. (It's survived mine.) I've been surprised with how chip resistant, scratch resistant, and wear resistant the ceramic coating is--surprised because the coating is VERY thin, a small fraction of a millimeter. My biggest concern about the durability is that the sharpener seems to be getting progressively more clogged with microscopic particles of metal. I don't know for sure, but I would assume that enough clogging with metal traces would reduce sharpening performance. I have tried cleaning it off--tried rubbing it on canvas, cordura, leather, and with a toothbrush. I've tried both dry and wet cleanings, with and without soap. Some particulate matter comes off, but most seems to be permanently lodged.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how does it perform as a sharpener?
Before I answer that, I need to give you some background of my skills as an edge sharpener, and also need to explain my procedure for testing knife sharpness.
The main thing to tell you about my knife sharpening skills is that I really suck. I've had a Spyderco sharpener--widely considered to be easy to use--and never managed to successfully sharpen an edge with it. I've had a Lansky sharpener--supposedly foolproof--and never managed to successfully sharpen an edge with it. I've had various grits of whetstones; again, no success. In the end, I gave my sharpening equipment to my ex (
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=939030&size=lg), who does the sharpenings for me. She and her husband seem to be able to sharpen just fine with the same equipment.
As for my sharpness measurement method, I did it as follows: I tied a loop of Johnson & Johnson waxed dental floss to the lid of a sport-style water bottle. I lifted the water bottle (very gently and slowly) by means of the knife to be tested, edge facing up, slipped under the loop of dental floss. I added water to the water bottle in 3-5 gram increments, until the weight of the water bottle was enough pressure for the knife to cut the dental floss. Then I weighed the water bottle full of water.
Alright, onto testing the sharpness of my knives. At the beginning of the testing period, the first item I tried was my Paul's Hatchet. The first thing I did with the Paul's Hatchet was purposely dull it by "cutting" into a 60 grit grinding belt (Blade held perpendicular to the belt, belt NOT attached to a grinder). By this method, I rapidly removed the fine edge on my hatchet entirely. In accordance with my sharpness measurements, it took over 2.5 pounds of pressure on the dental floss for the edge to cut through it.
So then I went to work sharpening it back up with the new sharpener. I used trailing strokes at the beginning, then switched to edge-first strokes, slightly diagonally, with the sharpener resting on my knee. Perhaps it was because the edge was so significantly worn down, perhaps it was because I'm a numbskull at sharpening, but it took a long time, and many hundreds of strokes. In the end, however, I successfully restored the edge. Specifically, I got the edge to where it took 580 grams of pressure to cut the floss. To put this into perspective:
cutting at 595 grams=the dullest at which I can scrape shave body hair
cutting at 460 grams=the dullest at which I can easily shave body hair
cutting at 390 grams=brand new factory edge on Cold Steel Gunsite
So, as you can see, I was able to bring the extremely dull edge back to just barely scrape-shaving sharp. For me, that's a major success. I've never before managed to bring ANY knife back to shaving sharp, much less one that had been purposely dulled with a grinding belt!
I do, indeed, consider this sharpener easy to use, even by a total dolt at sharpening. There's just something about the size and shape of this sharpener that makes proper strokes come naturally. And, rested upon my thigh, it was easy to be sensitive to the sound change and the changes in friction when sharpening at the correct angle. I don't know how to properly articulate this, other than to say that this sharpener is "unusually sensitive" to the proper angle and motion.
Without going into a lot more blather about each of my sixty or so sharpenings, let me summarize a few details: I was consistently able to bring back a shaving-sharp edge using this sharpener. I was able to get sharper edges with progressive use, the sharpest edge achieved was able to cut dental floss with 480 grams of pressure. It was easiest to use with convex edges, but not bad for use with flat edges.
As for the less desirable aspects of this sharperner:
It does not seem able to create "hair-poppin", "scary sharp" edges. (Or, at least, I cannot do so with this.)
It is fine enough grit that major sharpening, edge repair, or reprofiling would take a huge amount of time. I'd say that such usage is not realistically practical with this sharpener. I am guessing that this sharpener is designed primarily for putting touch-ups on knives that already have decent edges on them.
Oddly, it does not seem as effective on other knives as on Busse INFI knives.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A the very end of the testing period (the day before yesterday), I got a hold of a leather strop (a belt) and some Veritas green chrome stropping compound from Lee Valley. My intitial experiments with using this to strop knives that have been sharpened with the prototype sharpeners shows that such a method can produce VERY sharp knives. Specifically, I was able to bring my Busse knives to where they would cut the floss with 400 grams of pressure--just about as sharp as a Cold Steel fresh from the factory. This makes me wonder whether the green stropping compound on a leather belt could be used effectively without the sharpener. (A question that I cannot answer.) If it could, then it seems like bringing a glob of stropping compound would be even lighter and smaller than bringing the sharpener.
I have also experimented with Cliff Stamp's "sharpening for dummies" method of knife sharpening with a slack grinder belt (
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=208093&highlight=sharpening+dummies). I have found this method to be very easy, and yield moderately good results--sharpening well enough to produce edges which could cut dental floss with about 650 grams of pressure, a little below shaving sharp. While this method doesn't produce as good of edges, it still produces decent edges, and it weighs considerably less than the new sharpeners. It doesn't take up much space either--I'd say a tie between the two methods, spacewise. However, the grinding belts do wear out a lot more quickly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall, I'm quite pleased with the new sharpener. I'll be carrying mine in my sheath pocket.