Since bitten by the Spydie in March of last year, I've been on a quest to find the perfect EDC to replace my weary Kershaw liner lock. The search has been fun and has led me from the J. D. Smith, to the Chokwe, on to the Millie then the Para and now the Gayle Bradley. All of these are great knives each with much to commend them and, for me at least, each with at least one characteristic that, if I had my "druthers," I would prefer to be different. (Sound familiar?)
At this point, the Bradley comes pretty close to being perfect and I'm sorely tempted to order a second to put into reserve. However, having read such glowing reviews of the Stretch II, I'm wondering whether or not I should have a look. The CF Stretch at present is more expensive, which allows me to relish what a great value I've found in the Bradley and argues against the need to take one more bite of the apple. What do you think? Other than having the opportunity to try out another cool Spyderco, does one have any advantage over the other. Are these two mutually exclusive or complimentary? Any comparative feedback would be appreciated. The fate of my wallet hangs on your response!
At this point, the Bradley comes pretty close to being perfect and I'm sorely tempted to order a second to put into reserve. However, having read such glowing reviews of the Stretch II, I'm wondering whether or not I should have a look. The CF Stretch at present is more expensive, which allows me to relish what a great value I've found in the Bradley and argues against the need to take one more bite of the apple. What do you think? Other than having the opportunity to try out another cool Spyderco, does one have any advantage over the other. Are these two mutually exclusive or complimentary? Any comparative feedback would be appreciated. The fate of my wallet hangs on your response!