thought i'd find a post on this from before, but don't see one.
i'm wondering what people think about the relative merits and demerits of the 16.5" CAK vs. the regular 15" AK.
i gather with the full tang, the balance is going to be less tip forward with the CAK and there may be more percussive forces in the handle when striking. i likewise assume that the tang of the AK is more prone to failure, at least theoretically -- but i'm wondering how many people have actually gotten an AK tang to fail.
any other thoughts about differences in structure, toughness, or handling?
i used to be a sucker for full tangs and was drawn to the CAK, but i ended up with a 15" AK. it's served me well, but now a friend is getting one and i'm trying to offer advice.
i'm wondering what people think about the relative merits and demerits of the 16.5" CAK vs. the regular 15" AK.
i gather with the full tang, the balance is going to be less tip forward with the CAK and there may be more percussive forces in the handle when striking. i likewise assume that the tang of the AK is more prone to failure, at least theoretically -- but i'm wondering how many people have actually gotten an AK tang to fail.
any other thoughts about differences in structure, toughness, or handling?
i used to be a sucker for full tangs and was drawn to the CAK, but i ended up with a 15" AK. it's served me well, but now a friend is getting one and i'm trying to offer advice.