this is a question especially for Sal.
I just can't seem to figure out why the civvie wasn't made a liner lock.
since I have my military with the perfectly executed, smooth and strong lock, I'm curious why the civilian ís a lockback.
in my mind, a liner lock is far easier to open (inertia openings etc.) than a lockback under various circumstances, a point which should be crucial for a self-defense knife like the civvie. in addition, lock strenght can't be an issue with a blade shape exclusively intended for slashing.
assuming it had a liner lock, I'd sure buy one sooner or later (it doesn't really matter that I certainly will neither NEED nor ever USE it, does it?
)
so please enlighten me and tell me what's the reason it wasn't made a smooth and
linerlock?
I'm sure you're getting tired of these "why-didn't-you-make-knife-XY-whith-the-feature Z...?"-sort of questions, but I just couldn't keep from asking this one.
keep up the great work,
dcjs
[This message has been edited by dcjs (edited 04-16-2001).]
I just can't seem to figure out why the civvie wasn't made a liner lock.
since I have my military with the perfectly executed, smooth and strong lock, I'm curious why the civilian ís a lockback.
in my mind, a liner lock is far easier to open (inertia openings etc.) than a lockback under various circumstances, a point which should be crucial for a self-defense knife like the civvie. in addition, lock strenght can't be an issue with a blade shape exclusively intended for slashing.
assuming it had a liner lock, I'd sure buy one sooner or later (it doesn't really matter that I certainly will neither NEED nor ever USE it, does it?


so please enlighten me and tell me what's the reason it wasn't made a smooth and

I'm sure you're getting tired of these "why-didn't-you-make-knife-XY-whith-the-feature Z...?"-sort of questions, but I just couldn't keep from asking this one.

keep up the great work,
dcjs
[This message has been edited by dcjs (edited 04-16-2001).]