classic vs. regular?

B

bongod

Joined
Oct 20, 2000
Messages
8
here's a subjective question - which style do you prefer - the regular sebenzas or the classic 2000? i've never held a classic before, but i have held the regular small sebenza and it fits pretty well in my hands. In my opinion, the classic 2000 looks nicer - i dont' know if i like the look of all those "teeth".

let's hear some opinions!

(had to make an edit - i spelled "hear" as "here")

[This message has been edited by bongod (edited 10-31-2000).]
 
Regulr for me, just feels better. Nice lines on the classic, though.

------------------
James Segura
San Francisco, CA
 
I was contemplating the same question. The C;assic's handle appeals to me more, but I like the Plain's blade configuration better. Does anyone know if you can order the Classic handle with the Plain's blade shape? Also, further feedback on the original question would be appreciated by anyone who's handled both knives.
 
I have a small wood inlay, and a large classic 2000. I really like the looks of the classic better, as far as shape. After handling both, I have to say the regular design feels better in the hand. The scallops really had to the grip retention, and the indexing in the hand. I haven't held a large regular style seb, but I think that would be the best in my hands as far as feel and comfort.
Kyle
 
Have both ~ love both ~ prefer the classic ~ won't rid myself of the "regular's!"
biggrin.gif


(Sorry....I had to edit also. Spelt GigOne as GodOne. It was an honest mis-steak! REALLY! !)
wink.gif



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GigOne
"Livin' Life - Full Throttle"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


[This message has been edited by GigOne (edited 11-05-2000).]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top