Cliff Stamp, Lifetime Warranties, and INFI. . . All rolled into one.

Jerry Busse

Moderator
Joined
Aug 20, 1999
Messages
11,991
LET’S TALK ABOUT CLIFF STAMP:

There has been much discussion lately about knife testing. With these discussions come unsupported shots at some of those who do extreme testing. Of course, you can’t bring up the subject of “Extreme Testing” on these forums without bringing up the name of Cliff Stamp. Along with the mention of Cliff’s testing come the detractors to his methodology. The detractors often, for whatever reason, resort to taking personal shots at Mr. Stamp. I must admit that I find myself confused by the animosity that many have shown towards this individual. Perhaps I have missed something, but I have yet to see Cliff return fire on anyone at a personal level.

Before this discussion goes any further let me set the record straight on some accusations that have been leveled recently on the forums and in private emails. First of all, Cliff Stamp does not work for Busse Combat. . . he is in no way affiliated with Busse Combat. . . . and more importantly he really does exist and lives in Newfoundland thus proving that “I” am not “him”. . . He does not get paid or receive a “kickback” when he puts us at the top of the heap of blades that he has tested. . . . If you think that this clarification sounds unnecessary then you are only beginning to see the level of stupidity that some of these discussions can reach.

Cliff Stamp tests many knives to the point of total destruction. He has broken one of our knives (a Basic #7) during his testing. Cliff, breaks knives, it’s what he does. I don’t understand why, when he breaks someone’s favorite brand or make of knife, there is such anger. He broke ours while pounding the sand out of it with the hammer end of a hatchet. It had endured this level of abuse for more than 2 years. Was I excited about it? No. Did I think it was unfair? Who cares? Remember, that Cliff, breaks knives, it’s what he does. When a lion trainer is attacked by a lion, why are people shocked? It’s what lions do. Cliff, breaks knives, it’s what he does. It is also important to note that not ONE forum member on the Busse Combat Forum attacked Cliff for his methodology when he broke the Basic # 7. I admire that. It says a lot about our customers.

Cliff presents information. How those who choose to read it assimilate that information, is up to the individuals who are doing the reading. I do not see where there is room for personal attacks. You can argue methodology but personal attacks simply show fear.

LET’S TALK ABOUT WARRANTIES:

Frankly, makers and manufacturers who maintain the power of final judgment when it comes to warranty decisions and yet continue to claim that they offer a “Lifetime Warranty” confuse me. Where is the anger that should be directed towards these manufacturers and individuals? How can you rely upon a warranty that relies upon the judgment of the person who stands to be put at a financial loss if it is honored? This quite obviously sets the stage for bias from the maker or manufacturer. They reserve the right to say, “Well, you shouldn’t have done that with your knife and therefore you have voided your lifetime warranty.” Why should anyone believe that their knife will stand up to hard use when their warranty will not?

It’s all about TRUST. How can I, as a knifemaker, on one hand say that my knives are designed for the most extreme situations that may present themselves to our customers and then on the other hand cry foul when someone destroys one during use? I try not to judge whether or not a customer’s use of one of our blades is “too abusive”. Who am I to judge? That is why our guarantee has the word “intentional” in it. We allow the customer to make the decision as to whether or not he meant to damage his Busse knife. That’s called TRUST, and that’s what our customers put in us when they buy a Busse knife. We’re not about to betray that trust by allowing “our” judgment to decide whether or not “their” knife should be covered by “our” warranty. . . Lifetime warranties with “Abuse Clauses” are limp-wristed and do nothing more than demonstrate the amount of faith, or lack of faith, that a maker or manufacturer has in their product.

LET’S TALK ABOUT INFI:

How does INFI compare to other commonly used cutlery steels? It quite simply SPANKS them. If it didn’t, and there was a steel that could outperform it on all levels then we would be using it instead. We have been making knives for twenty years. We have used every steel imaginable. None of them compare with INFI. . . None of them. I am commonly dismayed by those who try to make claims of equivalence or comparability to INFI with steel like ATS-34, A-2, and 1095. INFI has set a publicly demonstrated standard that NO ONE has been able to near. We expect there to be unsupported claims of comparability with INFI from customers and fans of other manufacturers. They have no stake in the game and are no different than those who stand on the side-lines and push other people into fights. However, until another manufacturer comes along and publicly duplicates our series of tests with one of their knives, we will continue to be the performance standard by which all production knives will be measured.

Understand that we are not claiming to have a design that will satisfy everyone’s needs or tastes. We never have and never will. However, when it comes down to the pure, unadulterated performance of the steel involved . . . Busse Combat and INFI continue to stand alone.

Jerry Busse
 
Busse Combat and INFI continue to stand alone.
Jerry Busse
Not quite true, mon Capitain. We Busse fanatics are standing right here with you. :D :D :D :D

Sorry to hear that others would impugn Cliff's testing services to the knife knut community worldwide. I like your perspective on warranties. I will no doubt be one of the many Busse users who will never approach the breaking limit of your blades and so never get to test the verity of your warranty. No big deal. I still get to use your amazing blades to achieve my own limited needs.

Thanks both for making these "tougher than hell" knives and for being such a stand-up guy.

(I mean it when I say) Sincerely Yours,
Greg
 
Busse has the best warranty in the business. Period.
Infi is a superb steel and Busse are superb knives for hard use.
I also sometimes shake my head in disbelief at some of the criticism levelled at Cliff. We may not always agree with him, but he is IMHO an invaluable resource and an intelligent, honest knife fanatic. He is an expert whose methods and analysis deserve very serious consideration.
His opinion of Busse knives is not hyperbolic or uncritical: it is his honest opinion, amply supported by evidence which he puts out there for everyone to see and evaluate.
However, I don't believe that Cliff and Jerry are two different people. A secret potion accounts for both of them. What I'm not sure of is which one is Dr. Jeckyl and which Mr. Hyde. :D
Don't tell me any of us are supposed to believe there is some place called "Newfoundland". I can tell you all with certainty that up here in canada, nothing exists outside of Toronto :)
 
About Cliff Stamp:

I have a couple of things to say. I originally read about the Battle Mistress a couple of years ago on another site. I became interested in it, but I didn't get convinced until I read the long review that was recently re-posted. I drooled over the BM for about a year and a half until I finally had the means to get one. And, I got a Natural Outlaw...And, I got a ZT Satin Jack. And (wow), I'm going to get a couple of the fighters. I don't think I would have drooled so much or spent the cash for these knives had it not been for the knowledge, and for the extreme testing that Cliff does.

Further, I recently sent Cliff an email just getting his opinion on something. Cliff doesn't really know me from Adam, aside from me accusing him of hiding in a mountainside with a molecular destabilization device to wreak the havoc that he does!!, but that was done in jest, and I hope he knows that..He took the time to write me a very long and detailed response to my inquiry as to his opinion on what type of knife would serve me best for a particular task. That shows his love for blades and his willingness to help others in the community with the knowlege that he posseses. I appreciate the time he took to do that. He didn't have to, but he did, and it helped me tremendously by reaffirming what I thought I knew. It just felt better having his "Stamp" (get it?) on it. Thank you Cliff!

AS FAR AS WARRANTIES:

Busse's warranty was one other major selling point in convincing me to turn over my hard earned cash for these beauties. 'Nuff said.

YES, LET'S TALK ABOUT INFI:

I don't want to get into specifics about the metal (because those in the know already acknowlege it's the best--bar none), but really about the availability of different models. (I won't bring up the folder!) I love the new fighter series, but I'm still looking for something small, lean, and mean (mmmm...those words could be used in its name, maybe) in about a 3.5-4" configuration that could be used as an everday sheath carry knife. I know there are used models on the market for about $1800.00, but I would like to see some kind of current offering in this style of knife. Maybe a nice drop point, or I would even settle for a tanto style, just as long as it had the right kind of grip for every day tasks. It would be used as a general utility tool around the camp or for every day chores....sigh, now, that would make a great Christmas gift.

Yes, I love INFI. I just need it in a different shape. Any chance of coming up with something like that? Don't stone me, Jerry. Just curious...

Anyway, love what you've got and I'm looking forward to what's coming next!!
 
I have seen Cliff's work get reviewed quite negatively on that "other forum".

Cliff may not be perfect, but his reviews are the best out there so far. Until someone comes along with a better one....he da MAN !

As for INFI and the Busse Warranty - comparing those two items to products from other companies is like comparing a Turbo Porsche to a bicycle !

Long live Busses!
 
Just like my signature line says to all of the doubters, "TAKE THE
@#$%^&* TEST". In other words, put up or shut up. If the tests are fairly applied, see what rises to the top in performance and durability.

I work hard for my money, and I chose where I spend it wisely (o.k. the baseball card investment didn't work out..), but I can't be worrying that my gear will fail at the worst possible moment.

When we are kids, we buy the fads, we buy for looks. As we wise up, we find that the best way to buy is to get the ones you would stake your a&& on.

A little over a year ago, I joined the Busse family. It was a choice made from a lot of research. I would do it again, I just wouldn't wait so long this time.

To all detractors, let's do the test dance. Mine against yours. Loser has a crow buffet on the forums.

TAKE THE TEST. You will see.


Mike
 
Hey Guys....

A couple of times Cliff and I haven't seen eye to eye on some things..

I don't always agree with the way he does his testing,,and yes I probably can be accused of a personal attack or two,,but one thing I'm pretty sure of,actually positive of..

Cliff is truthful in his reviews..
I may not agree on how he gets to the finality of his tests,,but that's my thing...

I also reread Cliff's review of the BM and found it interesting.. Nothing that really shocked me..Pretty much what I expected...

Would I buy a beer for ole Cliff at the next CKG show, hell ya, and then we can go out into the parking lot and watch Cliff disassemble a a Nissan with his Busse..:)

Cliff and I will probably never see eye to eye on some of his methods,,but thats my problem...
However he came to the conclusion of his tests is his thing.. I'll never question him on his truthfulnes.

(Quick Jab)

Cliffs the type of guy that when he sees his oil light come on in his car,,he wants to know how long he can drive it before his blows a valve through the hood..:)

You've done that before haven't you Cliff.. :) or at least Want to,,Don't ya.. Huh!!LOL:)

Besides he's a Canjun,, I gotta stick up for him...

ttyle

Eric...
 
OK (lurker here) Busse knives are the only knives that have stood up to Cliff's "tests" untill he finally "took off the gloves" so to speak and broke it. Am I correct in saying that no other knife has withstood the abuse the likes of which Cliff wrought on his Busse? This has got to have a bunch of makers and manufacturers panties in a bunch, so it really comes as no surprise that people i.e. makers/manfacturers (come on now, who else would say this?) would be claiming that Jerry and Cliff are one and the same. I find this amussing and it makes me want a Busse even more because if "people;)" are so upset that Cliff did in their knives so much easier than a Busse that they have to spread these kind of falsehoods to try and discredit you, in my eyes that says alot about the superiority of your knives compared to all others Cliff has "reviewed". As soon as I save up, my check for a Busse knife is in the mail! Jerry I think that with all you've done to bring knife performance to a whole new level, these kinds of alligations do more good than harm.
Who were these people that said this about you?
Seems like you have alot of people trying to play catch-up with you and they ain't liken' it wun little bit!:cool:
 
Cliff Stamp...
I read about Busse Combat in a knife mag, but it was Cliff's reviews that made me actually buy one (my own use made me buy another:)). While some of the tests Cliff does have no similarity to my personal use, what's there to complain about? Alot of them do. Some of them have dispelled some misconceptions I had. Others have shown me ways to get better performance out of my own knives. I just appreciate the fact that he makes it public. I take what applies to my use, and leave the rest. Simple. What's all the fuss about?
I've exchanged an email or two with Cliff, and had a transaction with him. IMO, he's honest, straightforward, and generous.

Warranty?
That's a damn fine warranty. Only one that equals it is Strider's from what I've seen. A warranty like that is impressive. Tells me the maker has confidence in his product, which gives me confidence, both in the maker, and the product.

INFI?
I don't have tons of experience with different steels, but INFI is the most impressive thing I've seen. Actually, most of my "Busse use" has been with a Basic 5. Modified INFI is incredible enough, and my INFI blade is even better? I can live with that:)

Garrett, I'm right there with you on the carry knife. Take a SJ, make it 3/16", knock 2 to 2-1/2" off the blade, drop point---SOLD:D
 
Jerry, nicely put.

Cliff seems to bend over backwards to only state what he finds during his tests. Sometimes I wish he would put a little more bias and attitude into his review conclusions to hot them up a bit. If someone took offence/gave grief over comments about a hammer or hedge trimmer then we would all think they were totally off their rocker.

I havn't bought a Busse because I haven't found a design to fit me. Also I have some good tools that don't need replacing and their steel is holding up to the use I'm giving them. But I must admit I'd love to have an Inf steel blade to play with as its the steel has caught my imagination. Something for the future. Cliff Stamp reviews and others make the blade hobby more iteresting. Enthusiasm for ones products is no bad thing either. I'm a consumer, and at the end of the day I have more choise, better stuff and its less likely that I will pay out for a bummer. Trust is a two way thing, and as a knife consumer we aren't doing too badly. Bad apples don't last long. Rather than buyer beware its buyer darn unlucky; but more often that not its a happy buyer. Price doesn't always add up, but then a whole lot of the price is what you are buying into.

A SAS recruit was on his last mile of selection. He fell and cut his hands off on a piece of wire. Not to be beaten he sewed them back on with a needle and thread and his teeth. On passing the finish line, with seconds to go, he gave the two thumbs up. Unfortunately one of the thumbs pointed down. :D
 
Cliff ain't right... But by God he's one of us! And I'll fight any man who says different. Bravo Jerry, you said it all.:D
 
It's amazing what people will do to discredit an honest and fair test when there product does not come out on top. I've found Cliff's reveiws to be honest and informative. Sooo, too all you crybabys out there, INFI spanks everything out on the market. Nuff said.
Your's in nuclear spanking,
Andrew Pinchen
P.S.- sorry I haven't been on in awhile but the last three months have been nuts.
 
Nicely put, Jerry!!

I can't believe all the negative comments made about Cliff Stamp on this forum. It is a shame that a knife lover would come here and dedicate his time and knowledge to us and then be treated so poorly. Jerry brought up a great point, I have read countless numbers of threads where people are repeatedly getting personal and calling cliff names and stating things, that for the most part don't even make sense, what does Cliff do in a situation like this? He quotes the person word for word and answers every legitimate question that was asked. Never have I seen him "Lash out" or "Strike back", he ignores the insults and like a real adult, he uses facts and a friendly attitude to keep the thread going. Cliff is always willing to answer emails and offer advice whenever it is asked for. Just because you don't like someones knife review, or don't agree with their personal beliefs, does not make them a bad person. Here's to you Cliff! Keep up the good work.
 
This is a topic that resonates quite deeply with me. Simply framed, if you don’t stress a knife until it breaks, you will never know how much it can take.

That Cliff has broken so many knives is not remarkable to me—it’s not even particularly noteworthy. All anyone has to do, to break any knife, is continue to apply stress until the knife fails. What is noteworthy to me about his testing is that it shows how much punishment some knives can take before failing. And conversely, it is noteworthy to see how little punishment many knives can actually take—especially knives that are touted by their makers as being fit for “extreme” use.

Cliff’s track record of testing knives is remarkable to me because of its context. He pushes knives until they fail, meticulously recording what stresses have been applied up to and precipitating the failure. He pushes many, many knives in many different kinds of stress tests, but always his results are recorded in context. He gives precise data on at least one control blade that has gone through the same testing as the subject blade, which in turn gives an indication of comparative performance against the whole array of knives he has tested.

That Busse’s take so much punishment, work so hard and so efficiently, before they fail in Cliff’s tests is remarkable primarily because of these comparisons with so many knives that fail those tests at much lower stress levels. The result—-that Cliff is attacked for his methods—-is not surprising. You have a few knives that excel surprisingly under extreme stress—-with Busse’s at the top of that list. On the other hand you have the equivalent of many boxes full of broken blades that failed long before they were expected to, given the claims of their makers, or at least failed well before these top examples did.

Who can blame knife makers for not warranting against such failure? They know their knives won’t take such abuse, and so cannot guarantee against it. This is not surprising, and it’s not wrong. Most tasks, for which one would use a knife, do not approach the stress levels Cliff applies.

What is surprising is that there are knives that DO survive such stress levels so consistently. And it is these knives in general, and Busse’s in particular, that cause a problem for other makers by comparison in Cliff’s testing. The real shame is that Cliff—a meticulous, talented, and tireless professional scientist—is left to face continuous undeserved flak from a cadre of these makers and their misguided supporters, because they feel threatened by his well-documented comparisons with better knives such as those made by Busse.

Sometimes Cliff is not tactful. Sometimes he is brisk. Sometimes he is cryptic. Sometimes he may even appear ruthless. But if any of us were to stand alone in his shoes—-and take such wholesale abuse for his considerable trouble—-I really think we’d be hard pressed to stand up as well or as gracefully.

I’m reminded of a question I once put to him jokingly, concerning his own personal “tensile strength”. His answer was, “Currently less than INFI.” After watching his performance under stress for the past couple of years, I’m sure that if he’s not quite as strong as INFI, the margin would have to be characterized as “insignificant in field use”.

But then, anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm.

-w
 
Excellent post Will. . . Why is it that after reading many of your posts I often find myself saying. . . "Shoot. . . I wish I had said that!"?

Cliff certainly ignores personal attacks much better than anyone else that I have seen on these forums.

Yours in nucleadmiration for all Busse Forumites,

Jerry Busse
 
Jerry :

I have yet to see Cliff return fire on anyone at a personal
level.

Personal attacks are a sign that you are too emotionally involved in the
issue, and as well, logic, reason and empirical evidence can't support your
argument. In regards to emotional involvement, knives to me are just tools.
Greenjacket illustrated this point perfectly with the following :

If someone took offence/gave grief over comments about a hammer
or hedge trimmer then we would all think they were totally off their
rocker.

As for the second part, if my argument is without merit then I will abandon
it. I would look upon this as a positive event because I would have learned
something about knives which is one of the main reasons I discuss them.

Cliff presents information. How those who choose to read it
assimilate that information, is up to the individuals who are doing the
reading.

This is very much a critical point which I have repeated many times. My
reviews are not "ads" intended to promote a particular brand of knife. The
goal of the review is to present work where the knife does very well, and
work where it does not, as well as present reasons for the performance in
terms of geometry and materials issues. In order to interpret them the reader
must look at how they would use the blade. My opinion here is of little
relevance as what I want/need a specific blade to do could have nothing in
common with the requirements of another individual.

As well, also included in the reviews is the contact information for the
maker/manufacturer as one very necessary step is to discuss the results with
them and see if they are to be expected. If not, then drop me a line and I
will include that information in the review. Further, the reviews are linked
to a thread on Bladeforums, usually in the reviews forum, where you can see
feedback from other users, and of course add your own. This again is to
prevent the reviews from being simply a promotion of my viewpoint but more
so a part of an overall picture.

You can argue methodology

Yes, and this is the primary reason I post a link on Bladeforums. If you
look at a review from two years ago and compare it to a current one you will
see large changes in the methods used and how the results are presented.
This is due in great part to feedback from users. If you think there are
better ways to examine the performance I am looking at or there is a need
for clarification, or something that you feel is being ignored, drop me an
email or make a post.

Garrett Lucas :

He took the time to write me a very long and detailed response to my
inquiry as to his opinion on what type of knife would serve me best for a
particular task.


A huge amount of what I know comes from discussions with other blade users
and makers. To simply take this information and not give it back would not
be right, and quite simply I enjoy talking about knives. My email responses
however can be quite slow depending on how much free time I have, but
eventually replies will be sent out. In regards to detail, even really
restricted questions are quite complicated. Usually people who excessively
simplify are selling something.

For example what chops wood better a good hatchet or a Battle Mistress? The
answer is that it depends on the size and type of wood, as well as the
technique and physical ability of the user. A decent answer would be a
couple of pages. Considering that, an answer to which overall is a "better"
woodcraft tool takes quite some time to cover in the necessary detail.
Someone asked me about this recently and it lead to me expanding the wood
chopping section of the reviews significantly dealing with penetration
ranks, cut ranks and how they are effected by the size and density of the
wood. I am about halfway done to presenting a decent answer I think

GREENJACKET :

Cliff seems to bend over backwards to only state what he finds during
his tests. Sometimes I wish he would put a little more bias and attitude
into his review conclusions to hot them up a bit.

The reviews are very dry, however this is done for a very specific reason.
The conclusions drawn from the reviews should not be influenced by anything
other than content. They are not intended to be entertainment just hopefully
informative. This manner also allows me to approach the results in a manner
as free from bias as possible. More on that below.

WILL YORK :

Most tasks, for which one would use a knife, do not approach the
stress levels Cliff applies.

Yes, most damage is caused by accidental misuse, the times when you cut
something that you wish you had not.

The real shame is that Cliff-a meticulous, talented, and tireless
professional scientist-is left to face continuous undeserved flak from a
cadre of these makers and their misguided supporters, because they feel
threatened by his well-documented comparisons with better knives such as
those made by Busse.

None of those rantings have any effect on me, aside from amusement. When I
read such attacks, I pretty much see them as saying "I am biased and my
argument is without merit". The main problems with such comments are that
they spreads misinformation and obviously don't exactly promote negative
feedback. Thus in time this will cause an over promotion of the knives
defended in such a manner and thus always lead to hype. This is a circular
chain of events which feeds off of itself.

Sometimes Cliff is not tactful. Sometimes he is brisk. Sometimes he
is cryptic. Sometimes he may even appear ruthless.

Generally if I am dealing with performance, I have to separate myself from
the issue as any emotional involvement can drastically influence the
results. For example there are makers that I have a very positive opinion
of, if I thought about this while commenting on the performance of their
blades, it would be very difficult to note in detail the aspects that I
think are relatively weak. By the same notion, if I feel the opposite way
about a maker, it can be very easy to over focus on the negative if I dwell
on those feelings, and that would hardly be fair.

Finally a note about warranties, quite frankly you cannot even begin to
offer competition as a hard use knife unless you match the Busse Combat
warranty. Secondly, to clarify one issue that is constantly confused, a
strong warranty is not actually desired because you will get a replacement
if the knife fails. The main attraction is that it indicates that such an
event is very unlikely to happen in the first place. Quite simply you can't
put such a strong warranty on a product that does not perform (with the
obvious exception being dirt cheap products which doesn't apply here).

When I first spoke to Busse on the phone a few years ago, I was impressed
when after asking him about a few specific uses he discussed the performance
of the knife with specific detail. I was more impressed when I asked him if
he had a problem with me duplicating the performance claims, and he said
something like - by all means go ahead. It is one thing to state a level of
performance - anyone can do that. It is quite another thing to guarantee a
level of performance. No double speak, no this is what I can do, however if
you do it, well that is abuse etc. . It puts the knives at a standard that
is rarely attempted let alone reached.

Thanks for the positive comments all.

-Cliff
 
Cliff, I was going to say "nice post" but then I remembered that some people think that "I" am "you" and therefore they would see this as me simply complimenting myself. So, in light of this, I would like to say that I enjoyed your post very much even though I might be you in which case I enjoyed my own post very much and you continue to not exist. . . . however, if it turns out that you and I are actually different people, meaning that we exist in two different places at two different times, thus supporting one of the primary tenets of physics as I remember it, then, and only then, in that case alone, did I enjoy your comments. I apologize if this post has seemed confusing. It's just that I'm not exactly sure whether or not I am the one who wrote it. . . . ;)

In all seriousness though, I suppose that I appreciate Cliff's comments and reviews because they do have a "dry academic" flavor. A lot of information and not a lot of unsupported hype. There is plenty of passion in the knife industry, from both the customers and the makers. . . Thank Heavens! If there weren't, we would be lucky to have 3 people on these forums. . . . It is also why there aren't screwdriver forums (that I'm aware of). I just can't imagine people arguing over the benefits of a Craftsman #2 Philip's vs. a Stanley #3 Philip's.

It is, likewise, important to read all reviews. Knowledge is gained through open-minded exposure. I learned a long time ago that if I were willing to listen to all of the positive comments about our knives, then I had to be willing to listen to the negative comments as well. It is why Busse blade designs are not stagnant and will continue to evolve. We listen to our customers, and I guarantee that you, our friends on the forums, will continue to serve as an important part of our Research and Development department. We have certainly learned more from our "Nuclear Test Team" than we could hope to have learned on our own. We have also implemented many agreed upon lines of criticism into our constant design evolution.

We will continue to be passionate about our bladeware. . . I know that I am cursed with this characteristic. It is difficult for me to hold my tongue on many discussions that take place on some of the other forums. I am not, by nature, a man blessed with a high level of tolerance. Remaining silent and open minded to comments that I find to be full of stupidity and hot air is often very difficult. I have often wondered, if I were the customer and able to speak freely, how vocal and ultimately despised I would be on some of these forums. I am sure that with my strong points of view on bladeware design and performance that I would quickly be chastised. However, unlike Cliff who remains calm, I would be the moron who would schedule meetings in the parking lot at every Blade Show. ;) I have learned much more from holding my tongue than I have from letting it flap in the breeze.

So, keep your passion at the boiling level, but temper it with an open mind. It is this combination that leads to a greater knowledge of bladeware performance.

INFInitely yours in a nuclear quest for greater knowledge,

Jerry Busse
 
Originally posted by Jerry Busse
However, unlike Cliff who remains calm, I would be the moron who would schedule meetings in the parking lot at every Blade Show.

If you ever decide to proceed with that idea, and could give me a copy of that schedule, including opponents and weapons scheduled for each bout, I think you could pretty much replace knife making altogether as a profit center. With a little promotion, we should be able to go into direct competition with the NFL, WWF and other major-league purveyors of violence-based sports for the discriminating male viewer.

"Wazzzuuuuup?"
"Havin' a Bud...watching the nuclear war..."

But then, as I've lamented before, if YOU didn't make Busse knives, who would?

Oh, yeah…

Hey, Cliff…?
 
Back
Top